Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comparision of CNVs from Two different platfroms

    Hi,

    I am quiet new to CNV analysis and i have a general query.

    I have SNP array data from Affymetrix and Illumina, would you please comment (or provide a reference) on the pros and cons of using two different platforms, like the possible issues to make a comparision between the CNV results? possible batch effects etc..

    What steps should be considered when using data from two different platforms. Any references would be helpful.

  • #2
    Do you mean that you have data from Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays, or Affymetrix arrays and Illumina sequencing data?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mastal View Post
      Do you mean that you have data from Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays, or Affymetrix arrays and Illumina sequencing data?
      Yes, the data is from Genotyping arrays i.e. Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hey Meher
        Pros i would say having more data, cons - different methods to get your data into penncnv (or your downstream pipeline).
        It really depends on what type of analysis you want to do downstream ?? Association ?? or looking at specific CNVs ?? Batch affects I would assume depending on you preferences (i normally go at least 10 probes and at least 20kb in size -- only because i have sequencing data as well as the arrays) ... if u have access to the DNA, run a taqman on specific CNVs detected on both platforms........ but from my experience, because of the size of CNVs you shouldn't have as many issues as SNPs ... another thing you might like to do is compare all the probes between the two different types of arrays and exclude exclusive probes... I hope this helps and not a repeat of what you already know

        cheers
        Josh

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X