![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
strand-specific cDNA | papori | General | 26 | 08-02-2017 11:30 AM |
rna-seq experiment not strand-specific or coverage symmetry | laupl | Introductions | 2 | 05-09-2012 08:19 PM |
Strand-specific library appears not strand-specific | oligo | Illumina/Solexa | 7 | 12-08-2011 10:54 AM |
IGV reverse strand gff | NicoBxl | Bioinformatics | 1 | 04-01-2011 03:16 AM |
is rna-seq experiment strand-specific or not? | laupl | Introductions | 2 | 10-14-2010 01:56 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Geneva, Switzerland Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
|
![]()
I have a paired-end, strand-specific dataset and used Trinity to assemble the contigs. I then mapped the reads back to the contigs to calculate transcript abundance and viewed the resulting bam file in IGV (don't have a reference genome).
Is there a way that I can tell whether my dataset is really strand-specific just by looking at the picture in IGV? If I had single-end sequences I should expect to have reads only in one strand (i.e. pointing to the right). Am I right? But since I have paired-end reads, what the IGV picture should look like? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Boston, MA Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 75
|
![]()
Hi,
It depends on the library details, but you should could try "color by first-in-pair" from the popup menu. This will color by the strand of the template, rather than the read, at least for libraries I am familiar with. Also, igvtools has options to compute coverage by pair strand, although this isn't available in igv itself yet. Better strand support is on our radar. Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Geneva, Switzerland Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Thanks Jim!
I selected "first-of-pair" as you told me but can't find out what the colors mean (and couldn't find it either in IGV's manual). Can you please explain what the colors (red, blue and grey) mean? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Boston, MA Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 75
|
![]()
red = neg strand (first read of the pair is no the neg strand)
blue = pos strand grey = pair information not available, so "first of pair" is undefined |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: Geneva, Switzerland Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Thanks for the info Jim!
So if most of the pairs in a contig contain reads that are like this: Code:
=====>----------<===== (red) (blue) Am I right? What if both of them are red or blue? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Heidelberg, Germany Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 994
|
![]()
No, even in a non-strand-specific library, the two reads of a pair should point towards each other (or away from each other if it was a library-prep protocol with circularization). You should check whether it is predominantly the first read that point in the sense direction of the gene it aligns to.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: Sydney, Australia Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 166
|
![]()
If I have Illumina directional RNA-seq data, should the colours be the opposite or the same as the strand of the RefSeq gene, when colouring by the first read of the pair ? My colours are opposite to the RefSeq gene, but when isoforms are assembled by Cufflinks with --library-type fr-secondstrand, the isoforms are, as expected, on the same strand as the gene.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Location: Pretoria Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4
|
![]()
So is directional RNA-seq the same as strand-specific RNA-seq? any clarification will be greatly appreciated.
Thanx |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Location: Pretoria Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Thanx panos-ed..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Location: Sweden Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi,
I am trying to align and count the reads of paired-end strand-specific RNA-seq data using Hisat and htseq-count. This is how my IGV look like. https://www.dropbox.com/s/snpapn051b...ness.jpeg?dl=0 (Color alignment by "first-of-pair strand") (view as pairs). I am confused now. Why all the read pairs are red for NFE2L2? and clur for HNRNPA3? I know that my data is strand specific, and that this color is showing the first pair read. So why both pairs have the same color? Also can anyone tell me what options I should use for Hisat (or Tophat2) and htseq-count? Thanks, Last edited by ArghavanAri; 09-14-2015 at 08:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Location: Ohio Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 144
|
![]()
The two genes are on different strands, you can see by the little chevrons in the annotation track at bottom, so that is expected.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
David Eccles (gringer)
Location: Wellington, New Zealand Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 838
|
![]()
As others have mentioned, you need to consider the direction of mapping as well as the read number. For a standard Illumina strand-specific sample preparation, the reverse read is the first read:
Just in case you weren't aware, Tablet (since v1.14.10.20) has a concordant / directional colouring mode that colours sequences appropriately. Last edited by gringer; 09-14-2015 at 08:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Junior Member
Location: Sweden Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Thanks for the information.
But I still cannot understand the difference between fr-firststrand & fr-secondstrand in Tophat2 (or RF & FR in Hisat). Can anyone help me with that? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Location: Ohio Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 144
|
![]() Quote:
I hope that makes sense -- you might need to go back to DNA/genome structure and how Illumina works to really understand the above. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Location: USA, Midwest Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,178
|
![]() Quote:
First 'fr' does not mean 'forward read'. What it means is the the two reads are arranged in the FR (Foward/Reverse) as opposed to the RF (Reverse/Forward) orientation. FR means that the read pairs are oriented with the 3' end point toward each other when aligned to the reference and RF means they are pointing away from each other. Code:
FR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------> <------------------- RF: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <----------------- -------------------> Code:
mRNA 5'-----------------------------------------------------------AAAAAAAAAAAA R2 ------------> <------------ R1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Location: America Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
|
![]()
Looks like Jim Robinson had it backwards for the color legends. Actually
red=positive, blue=negative He has clarified here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...lp/YiVzwnUuOZM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Location: Vancouver Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 21
|
![]() Quote:
I used Illumina dUTP-type stranded library prep and fr-firststrand with Tophat2. I find several places that say dUTP libraries should use fr-firststrand with Tophat, for example: http://onetipperday.sterding.com/201...pe-to-use.html https://www.biostars.org/p/64250/ Is anyone able to clear this up? Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
David Eccles (gringer)
Location: Wellington, New Zealand Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 838
|
![]()
Tablet has a "read concordance" mode for viewing strand direction on reads. Both pairs of reads that are consistent with a mapped direction following the reference sequence are coloured green (customisable), and reads that are consistent with the reverse complement of the reference sequence are coloured red.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
igv, strand-specific |
Thread Tools | |
|
|