SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PubMed: Effect of PCR extension temperature on high-throughput sequencing. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 04-23-2011 12:14 AM
PubMed: A framework for analysis of metagenomic sequencing data. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 12-02-2010 03:00 AM
PubMed: Orphelia: predicting genes in metagenomic sequencing reads. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-12-2009 06:00 AM
PubMed: Soil Bacteria Denitrification Gene Cluster Characterization via a Metagenomic Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 11-18-2008 06:00 AM
PubMed: Metagenomic analysis of lysogeny in tampa bay: implications for prophage gene Newsbot! Literature Watch 1 09-24-2008 08:02 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2009, 03:10 AM   #1
Newsbot!
RSS Posting Maniac
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,443
Default PubMed: The effect of sequencing errors on metagenomic gene prediction.

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

Related Articles The effect of sequencing errors on metagenomic gene prediction.

BMC Genomics. 2009 Nov 12;10(1):520

Authors: Hoff KJ

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Gene prediction is an essential step in the annotation of metagenomic sequencing reads. Since most metagenomic reads cannot be assembled into long contigs, specialized statistical gene prediction tools have been developed for short and anonymous DNA fragments, e.g. MetaGeneAnnotator and Orphelia. While conventional gene prediction methods have been subject to a benchmark study on real sequencing reads with typical errors, such a comparison has not been conducted for specialized tools, yet. Their gene prediction accuracy was mostly measured on error-free DNA fragments. RESULTS: In this study, Sanger and pyrosequencing reads were simulated on the basis of models that take all types of sequencing errors into account. All metagenomic gene prediction tools showed decreasing accuracy with increasing sequencing error rates. Performance results on an established metagenomic benchmark dataset are also reported. In addition, we demonstrate that ESTScan, a tool for sequencing error compensation in eukaryotic expressed sequence tags, outperforms some metagenomic gene prediction tools on reads with high error rates although it was not designed for the task at hand. CONCLUSIONS: This study fills an important gap in metagenomic gene prediction research. Specialized methods are evaluated and compared with respect to sequencing error robustness. Results indicate that the integration of error-compensating methods into metagenomic gene prediction tools would be beneficial to improve metagenome annotation quality.

PMID: 19909532 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO