SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Regional/Local Communities > UK - Cambridge



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reliable gap closure of scaffolds with GapFiller boetsie Bioinformatics 51 04-27-2016 02:32 AM
DNASTAR Webinar on Gap Closure in Genomic Assemblies DNASTAR Events / Conferences 0 01-21-2013 09:17 AM
HELP, primer design problem in gap closure f0415007 General 1 09-28-2011 02:44 AM
HELP, primer design problem in gap closure f0415007 Illumina/Solexa 0 09-20-2011 11:46 PM
Computational Gap Closure for 454 and Solid avtsanger Bioinformatics 1 08-19-2010 05:02 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2013, 12:41 PM   #1
casim
Member
 
Location: Cambridge

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
Default CASIM: Assembly Gap Closure

What are the best methods/programs for attempting to close gaps between scaffolds after a de novo assembly has resulted in a large number of scaffolds (before resorting to further sequencing)?
casim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 08:45 AM   #2
krobison
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
Default

First, I don't know why you've chosen to prefix all your posts with your username; not a desirable strategy.

Second, you've failed to describe any details about the genomes you are working on, the data you've acquired & how you've tried to assemble. The size & complexity of the genome are critical to understand as well what you have in hand and what scientific goals you really want to address.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 08:50 AM   #3
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

This series of posts was intended to be topics from a conference/discussion panel to continue discussions here...I should've prefaced it with this before all the posts went up.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 05:49 PM   #4
krobison
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
Default

Okay, apologies for the previous comment.

There are a number of scaffolders out there, though I have used only SSPACE and without digging in much.

One thing that would benefit all of these programs is if there was a rigorous language for defining relationships that scaffolding might be based on. Ideally this would a XML; I know many folks aren't XML fans but the value of being able to validate inputs is powerful.

One distinction amongst scaffolders is their modularity. To give two examples, SSPACE is non-modular and must be run en masse. At the other extreme, SGA can apparently be used as a scaffolder & simply takes BAM files and a few parameters.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2013, 01:37 AM   #5
Blahah404
Member
 
Location: Cambridge, UK

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 48
Default

I've found that using the following sequence can massively improve contiguity in transcriptome assemblies - the same is likely true for genomes:

1. GapFiller
2. cap3
3. cycle through 1 and 2 again until contiguity gains plateau
Blahah404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO