![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cufflinks paper published at Nature Biotechnology | Cole Trapnell | Bioinformatics | 4 | 04-17-2011 02:27 PM |
Helicos: Yeast Transcriptomics in Nature Biotech | ECO | Helicos / Direct Genomics | 0 | 07-11-2009 01:03 AM |
Nature Biotech: Sequencing in real time | mgenome | Literature Watch | 0 | 02-09-2009 08:05 PM |
SEQanswers used as a reference in Nature Biotech paper! | ECO | Site Announcements | 5 | 10-26-2008 11:28 PM |
Nature Biotech: Next Gen DNA Sequencing Focus | ECO | Literature Watch | 0 | 10-12-2008 07:43 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: baltimore Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 89
|
![]()
Hi:
Did any one tested as a practice test the data set that was deposited in GEO. Trapnell et al. deposited data to GEO (GSE20846). I took that data (sam files and GTF files and ran through the cufflinks (cuffcompare and cuffdiff). cuffcompare 24.gtf 60.gtf 5d.gtf 7d.gtf cuffdiff stdout.combined.gtf 24.sam 60.sam 5d.sam 7d.sam Here cuffcompare output is stdout.combined.gtf (one of the Out put files). for cuffdiff I gave input combined.gtf and other sam files. when I check gene_exp.diff file, 6th column that defines the test result (NOTEST, OK, FAIL). In my case the result for this column for every row is NOTEST. that means not enough alignments for testing. Is there something wrong. thanks Adrian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Long island Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
|
![]()
I think they were using the old version of Cufflinks, cuffcompare cuffdiff etc....are you trying the version when the paper was published?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|