![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inconsistensies in RINs between Bioanalyzer and Tapestation | Holioneok | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 8 | 12-02-2015 07:11 PM |
Disagreement between bioanalyzer and agarose gel for PCR amplicon library | mbirnb | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 08-03-2015 10:28 AM |
Extra peaks in a bioanalyzer trace for library made from ePCR amplicon | dtm2451 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 15 | 06-09-2014 07:47 AM |
cuffdiff significantly differently expressed genes | Richard.Y | Bioinformatics | 4 | 01-14-2013 08:49 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Seattle Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Hello,
We are seeing a discrepancy between the Bioanalyzer and Tapestation for a large amplicon product that we received for sequencing. We received the PCR reaction for this amplicon and did an Ampure XP bead clean up. The PCR product was run on an agarose gel before giving us and a single band of the expected size (~665bp) and primer dimers (~100bp) was seen. When we ran in the bioanalyzer (attached ppt), there are two peaks showing up. One around 370bp and the other 664bp. On the tapestation (attached ppt) we only see a single peak around 670bp. What's causing this difference? Is the amplicon making secondary structure and migrating slower in the bioanalyzer? But in tapestation, why isn't the same thing showing up? Have anyone else seen this before? Just wanted to mention that the primers were ~30bp long and didn't have any ssDNA structures like the Y adapters in Illumina. This is a cDNA amplicon product that we are planning to ligate adapters to. Thanks in advance! Last edited by Pab77; 01-25-2016 at 12:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: New England Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
|
![]()
I have run a lot of amplicon samples on the Bioanalyzer and never seen that! Since it's a high sensitivity chip, is it possible that the previous run contaminated the electrodes with something 370 bp in length? I'd pull out the electrode cartridge, clean it thoroughly, and try again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Seattle Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Thanks for the reply! We actually ran two other samples in this same chip and those were not contaminated with this same peak. It's unlikely that only this pin was contaminated. We can try to redo the run but yes, it's really weird.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 119
|
![]()
I say re-run it and see what happens. With something this strange I always like to make sure the result is repeatable before looking too much into it.
Also, if you still have the rest of the 1:20 dilution run it on an agarose gel and see if the banding pattern repeats. There is a chance something strange happened during the dilution. Edit: One more thing. Was anything of this size (or expected size) run on the same chip? Maybe the well got double-loaded. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
amplicon, bioanalyzer, migration, tapestation |
Thread Tools | |
|
|