![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PubMed: Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA f | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 03-07-2013 01:20 AM |
Sequencing DNA/RNA of 4 genes of interest in multiple samples (n=50)? | Thomas Hartjes | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 6 | 11-11-2011 11:43 AM |
PubMed: Massively Parallel Sequencing of Pooled DNA Samples--The Next Generation of M | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-12-2010 03:01 AM |
PubMed: Deep sequencing to reveal new variants in pooled DNA samples. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 10-21-2009 03:02 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Sweden Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 18
|
![]()
Hi folks,
I have extracted DNA from fungi for whole genome sequencing (Truseq PCR free with 350 bp insert and HiSeq 2500 PE) using a kit. The extraction went smooth until I realized at the end that I treated my samples with only half of the recommended amount for RNase A (2 ul of 10 mg/ml instead of 2 ul of 20 mg/ml). I tried checking the DNA samples on 1% agarose and following is the gel image with 100-1000 bp ladder. ![]() I am not sure there are RNA bands (very faint though) at around 100-200 bp. Do you think my DNA samples are good enough to go for whole genome sequencing without additional treatments? Or shall I try to treat them with RNase A again? Unfortunately, I run out of fresh samples. ![]() I appreciate all your comments and suggestions. Best Vinn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
josh kinman
Location: Austin Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
|
![]()
These look fine. Even if you have some RNA in your sample it won't make into your final library after fragmentation and ligation steps.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
dna extraction, rna dna contamination, whole genome sequencing |
Thread Tools | |
|
|