Go Back   SEQanswers > General

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too many short reads and too little RAM? samanta General 5 09-22-2011 06:48 AM
short sequencing reads vlee2 454 Pyrosequencing 4 02-28-2011 08:34 AM
454 Reads correction with Short reads ? yvan.wenger Bioinformatics 3 11-26-2010 05:17 AM
clustering short reads lpantano Bioinformatics 2 02-02-2010 06:56 AM
High Short Reads % elly 454 Pyrosequencing 2 11-10-2008 01:10 PM

Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2011, 02:49 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Manchester

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Default Why using short reads?

Hi, everyone. I'm a newbie here.

I have a question that always baffles me that why NGS only uses short sequence tags?

Instead sequence the whole DNA fragments, it only sequences the first 25-50 bp of a DNA fragment.

Is there a particular reason for doing this?

Thank you!
dbrg77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 09:01 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747

It's what the technology is capable of. Most technologies attain their signal from a clonal population of DNA molecules which are signalling in sync; as this synchronization is lost (dephasing) the noise climbs; eventually noise overwhelms signal. The best review on this is in The challenges of sequencing by synthesis., whose author list features many of the heavy hitters in the field.

PacBio's SMRT technology (and Helicos' before it) looks at single molecules and therefore does not have a dephasing problem. For PacBio, the problem is apparently that the laser used to observe the sequencing eventually destroys the DNA polymerase that is doing the work, probably via a free radical mechanism. I don't know if Helicos ever figured out what kept their reads very short.

Note that short is not quite as short these days; SOLiD is getting around 75bp and Illumina on the order of 150 bp. 454 routinely gets 400+ (perhaps soon out to 800) and PacBio 1.5Kb. Still, all sorts of blue sky proposals are aiming at reads of 10s or perhaps 100s or even 1000s of kilobases.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO