![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pooling multiplexed libraries after ligation, before PCR | ScottC | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 05-07-2016 02:10 PM |
ELAND with indexed reads | wingtec | Introductions | 0 | 12-27-2011 07:53 AM |
PubMed: Genomic DNA pooling strategy for next-generation sequencing-based rare varian | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 09-18-2011 09:30 AM |
Genomic DNA Pooling Strategy for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Rare Variant Discov | Asashoryu | Literature Watch | 0 | 03-11-2011 01:18 PM |
Indexed Sure Select Capture | Bruce E | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 02-09-2011 07:54 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Davis Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi
We recently sequenced 20 indexed libraries on one lane of Hi-Seq. Unfortunately, the pooling strategy we used based on bioanalyzer data was not even. Any suggestion on the best pooling strategy to get uniform pool? Dinesh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Dallass Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
|
![]()
Quantitate your libraries by qPCR, not BioA.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Bethesda MD Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 509
|
![]()
Search the forum for threads addressing accurate library quantification. There are advantages and limits to each technique. For example, adapter dimer contamination can wreak havoc with qPCR measurements.
Harold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Vendor
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
|
![]()
Hello spdinesh,
In our experience, it is best to use multiple quantification platforms and go from there (bioanalyzer, Qbit, nanodrop), while knowing that +/- 20% is expected from pooling. Even pipette error can make a difference when pooling at n=20 with dilutions. What was the standard dev. seen from your libraries? jon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|