![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blastx | Desai | Bioinformatics | 1 | 01-27-2014 11:50 PM |
blastx against UniProt | papori | Bioinformatics | 5 | 12-26-2012 07:50 PM |
Learn how to use Blastx | angeloulivieri | Bioinformatics | 4 | 07-09-2012 01:25 AM |
Blastn or Blastx? | kalu | Bioinformatics | 11 | 09-23-2011 04:18 PM |
Help with BLASTX command | z3199001 | Bioinformatics | 3 | 10-11-2010 08:51 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Belgium Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 13
|
![]()
Dear all,
I have performed a blastx on my 30.000 contigs of my transcriptome. I want to keep only the contigs for which the sequence description (output of blast2go) is reliable. i often see papers in which people only use a e-value cut off or a bit score cut off. Using this, I still have contigs with hits with a similarity of 40% that are not removed. I'm convinced that this is insufficient to trust the sequence description and to continue with GO, KEGG pathways and any furhter downstream application. I would like to use a similarity cut off to reliable say that the contig is in fact the gene and related function of the blast results. Does anybody know what a good cut off value might be? Or how to proceed. I have yet to encounter a paper where people really adress the low similarity problem. If you would have any suggestions feel free to share. Cheers, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: urumqi Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 58
|
![]()
hello jevcampe,
did u solve your problem? if u did, what is the cut off you chose for similarity? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|