![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
short reads from amplicon for 454 using Titanium chemistry | pseudorabies | 454 Pyrosequencing | 9 | 08-15-2011 08:46 AM |
Assembling De Novo 454 Transcriptome Contigs and Singletons with Illumina Short Reads | Vickenstein | Bioinformatics | 7 | 03-05-2011 01:43 AM |
error correction for RNA-seq reads | fhb | RNA Sequencing | 6 | 11-18-2010 02:58 PM |
PubMed: Correction of sequencing errors in a mixed set of reads. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 04-10-2010 03:00 AM |
Alignment of ABI solid reads and 454 reads | baohua100 | Bioinformatics | 2 | 02-23-2009 05:58 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Switzerland Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 30
|
![]()
Hello everybody,
I can see that my 1Mio 454 reads are full of insertions/deletions in homopolymer regions, and of course this disrupts my ORFs in later stages (annotation step). Fortunately, I have ca 60mio Illumina reads that I can use to correct these errors. Both dataset are cDNA. Has anyone a preferred method to correct short sequencing error indels? If tractable, I would prefer correcting my reads rather than correcting my draft assembly obtained from those reads. I was going to use ssaha (or segemehl, qpalma, other?) to map the illumina reads on my 454 reads, and then extract a consensus by parsing the pileup file generated with samtools I have seen a few published, more advanced, methods available but I*do not now if one of them performs better (e.g. iCorn). Do you? Thanks a lot! Yvan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 415
|
![]()
I don't know if any programs will correct your reads!
See here for another effort .. I have got it to work but am still interpreting results http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3635 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Cambridge, UK Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
|
![]()
I did this once. My approach was to map the reads to the contigs (BWA -e5), realigned the indels using GATK and polished the contigs based on the the indel report. I did this multiple times as some corrections made it possible to correct other neighbouring regions.
I dont have the polishing script any more, but I recall it as fairly simple. It should be possible to polish the reads instead, with some perl regex magic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Cambridge Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|