SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > 454 Pyrosequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Genome Res De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembly b_seite Literature Watch 1 10-05-2017 12:26 AM
PubMed: Local De Novo Assembly of RAD Paired-End Contigs Using Short Sequencing Reads Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-06-2011 12:40 AM
PubMed: PerM: Efficient Mapping of Short Sequencing Reads with Periodic Full Sensitiv Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 08-14-2009 06:00 AM
PubMed: Mapping accuracy of short reads from massively parallel sequencing and the im Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 07-29-2009 06:00 AM
Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads. strob Literature Watch 0 01-21-2009 07:19 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2011, 06:30 AM   #1
vlee2
Member
 
Location: Richmond, VA

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Default short sequencing reads

We have a short reads problem when sequencing previously successfully sequenced library. Could somebody help me to figure out our problem?
Img1.png represent our first sequencing run of this library. Then at the same time we prepared two LV emPCR for this library. Img2.png represent our second sequencing run using beads from one LV emPCR preparation above and img3.png - third sequencing run using beads from another LV emPCR preparation.
Where these huge number of small fragments came from? 99% of reads carry same adapters of this library, so its not some sort of contamination.

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png img1.PNG (13.4 KB, 33 views)
File Type: png img2.png (6.6 KB, 21 views)
File Type: png img3.png (4.8 KB, 14 views)
vlee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 05:54 AM   #2
flxlex
Moderator
 
Location: Oslo, Norway

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 415
Default

Did you store the enriched beads for the third run for some time before putting them on the plate? Did the emulsion oil have a different lot number for the third run? Just some thoughts...
flxlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 06:10 AM   #3
vlee2
Member
 
Location: Richmond, VA

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Default

Thanks for your reply flxlex!
I stored those beads for the 3rd run about 4 days. We also checked the storage stability of enriched DNA beads and 3 months old beads produced good results.
We made beads for the 2nd and 3rd run at the same time, so we used same lot number of oil, and reagents.
Is there a possibility of some glitch on the sequencing side, because there was nothing wrong with beads preparation? Though another region on the plate had normal size distribution.

Thanks
vlee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 07:11 AM   #4
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default

Did you anneal the sequencing primer before storing the enriched beads? If so, maybe there was some primer denaturation over the 4 days the beads were waiting. Then signal from the beads might have been weak, resulting in short reads.

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 08:34 AM   #5
Soulbee
Member
 
Location: Toronto, Canada

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 25
Default

it looks like not very much of your actual library has amplified which makes me wonder if your adaptors/primers are annealed properly.. how was your enrichment?
Soulbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO