Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How to compare single-end vs paired-end RNA-seq data?

    Hi all,

    I’d like to compare RNA-seq data of WT (single-end RNA-seq) vs KO strain(paired-end RNA-seq), as follows:

    wt 0hr 1hr 3hr (single-end)
    KO 0hr 1hr 3hr (paired-end)


    Since I’m interested in the differentially expressed genes during time course between wt and KO strains, I thought by using bedtools multicov option, I can compare these data.

    I used the following commands;

    bedtools multicov -s -bams wt_0hr.bam wt_1hr.bam wt_3hr.bam -bed gene.bed > wt0-1-3hr.txt
    bedtools multicov -s -bams KO_0hr.bam KO_1hr.bam KO_3hr.bam -p -bed gene.bed > KO0-1-3hr.txt

    (If options were not correct, please let me know.)

    My questions are...

    *How does bedtools multicov treat paired-end reads? I mean, if both ends of a paired-end read were mapped to the same gene in the BED file are they then counted once or twice?

    *If comparing same condition data (= same sample preparation method), is it OK to compare the read count calculated from bed tools multicov?(Is there any need of normalizing data, like FPKM/RPKM or something?)


    Thanks in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin


    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
    Yesterday, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X