SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biological replicates for RNA-seq vpp605 RNA Sequencing 15 08-29-2014 04:30 AM
MACS2 ChIP-SEQ ANALYSIS WITH BIOLOGICAL REPLICATES leaskimo Bioinformatics 12 10-08-2013 12:10 PM
Biological and technical replicates in expression analysis (DESeq) NicoBxl RNA Sequencing 0 08-22-2013 04:01 AM
TSS analysis without biological replicates ralfne RNA Sequencing 0 11-14-2012 01:38 AM
RNA-seq technical replicates at library construction level obig Bioinformatics 9 08-15-2012 11:43 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2015, 02:43 PM   #1
bjackson
Junior Member
 
Location: Denver, CO

Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Default Question about biological vs technical replicates in RNA-seq analysis

Generally when I receive RNA seq data, I get biological and technical replicates. IE if there are two conditions (eg treated vs untreated), there will be three samples Treated-A, Treated-B, Treated-C, each with two technical replicates, Treated-A-Lane1 and Treated-A-Lane2.

What most of my group has previously done is just run them all as individual replicates (i.e. n=6). The only thing I could see this benefiting is to average out technical variation between the samples.

The other way I could think to do it is just automatically combining the technical replicates to increase the sequencing depth.

What do you all do? Use the technical replicates separately to increase n / average more variation or combine them to increase the depth?
bjackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2015, 12:13 AM   #2
dpryan
Devon Ryan
 
Location: Freiburg, Germany

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,480
Default

You can not use technical replicates to increase your N. If you do that, your results are simply wrong and any paper you publish with the results should be rejected. Your N is the number of biological replicates only.

Technical replicate are typically automatically combined (i.e., summed), since technical noise for (bulk) RNAseq is known to be approximately Poisson (this was shown in some of the early RNAseq papers, you can search for the reference). The only time people don't sum technical replicates is when they're comparing new methods, since then it's important to show that the new methods behave in a similar manner to the old ones.
dpryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 12:47 PM   #3
Bukowski
Senior Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 390
Default

I think you might be confusing actual technical replicates with your sequencing provider simply splitting a single pool across two lanes, which is desirable to remove batch effects between lanes - a better course than running some samples down one lane and some down another.

Devon is correct, they should be combined.

Last edited by Bukowski; 07-07-2015 at 12:50 PM.
Bukowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO