Hi All,
I have Illumina 101bp paired-end data where the libraries were prepared with custom inline barcodes at the P5 end. So the first 6 bases of the R1 reads contain the barcode sequences for demultiplexing. I used Flexbar 2.5 to demultiplex the reads and it assigned about 85% of them successfully (lower than i would of liked, but ok for now). However, when I look in the R2 reads for each sample I can see that there is a disproportionate number that have the barcode as well.
For example, with sample DK097, the output can be broken down as:
R1: [BARCODE] [ READ SEQUENCE ] 11.0 million reads
R2: [ READ SEQUENCE ] 10.5 million reads
R2: [BARCODE] [ READ SEQUENCE ] 0.5 million reads
What could cause the barcode to be appearing in the reverse read, often right at the start of the read, in up to 5% of the pairs??
cheers
DK
I have Illumina 101bp paired-end data where the libraries were prepared with custom inline barcodes at the P5 end. So the first 6 bases of the R1 reads contain the barcode sequences for demultiplexing. I used Flexbar 2.5 to demultiplex the reads and it assigned about 85% of them successfully (lower than i would of liked, but ok for now). However, when I look in the R2 reads for each sample I can see that there is a disproportionate number that have the barcode as well.
For example, with sample DK097, the output can be broken down as:
R1: [BARCODE] [ READ SEQUENCE ] 11.0 million reads
R2: [ READ SEQUENCE ] 10.5 million reads
R2: [BARCODE] [ READ SEQUENCE ] 0.5 million reads
What could cause the barcode to be appearing in the reverse read, often right at the start of the read, in up to 5% of the pairs??
cheers
DK
Comment