![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNA-Seq: Single Read and Paired End mRNA-Seq Illumina Libraries from 10 Nanograms Tot | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 11-09-2011 03:10 AM |
RNA-seq: read counts in single- vs paired-end sequences | fbarreto | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 08-03-2011 06:19 PM |
htseq-count with warning for every read to represent all of zero counts in output | hibachings2013 | RNA Sequencing | 10 | 07-15-2011 11:19 AM |
RNA SEQ Data read counts from known and unknown regions | deveci | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-24-2011 03:33 PM |
RNA-seq with paired-end reads | xuying | RNA Sequencing | 9 | 09-11-2009 04:00 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Dronning Maud Land Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
|
![]()
I saw a great question on the "RNA-seq Blog" (not mine)
http://rna-seqblog.com/information/t...ic-of-rna-seq/ "What sequencing depth is required for gene expression analysis? (i.e. Human sample, paired-end mappable reads, > 30 NT)" 30M was the most popular choice (for PE reads), which leads to my question. When doing Paired-End for RNA-seq and you are targeting 30M reads, do you treat read1 and read2 together for the read count (same transcript) or separately? My thought is if the read is only to ID the transcript for counting, 15M x 15M for PE would equal 15M reads if done SR. i.e. 30M reads could be 15M x 15M but also interpreted as 30M x 30M. Is it safe to assume 30M = 30M x 30M for PE RNA-seq? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|