Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Control-FREEC, input for ploidy

    Control-FREEC has an input for ploidy.

    I wonder what is considered a better practice (ploidy=2 or ploidy=4) if I'm looking at a near-tetraploid cancer tissue like this in a tumor-normal pair:


    The results are the output regions are a bit different for ploidy=2 and ploidy=4.
    When I used ploidy=4, I get results called "loss" for copy numbers of 2 and 3. I'm not sure if I want copy numbers of 2 and 3 called "loss".

    Should I use ploidy=2, or should I use ploidy=4 and then annotate "loss" and "gain" myself?

    Thanks in advance if anyone can clarify.

  • #2
    For tetraploid genome, cytogeneticsts always call CN> 3 as gain and CN< 3 as loss. You could treat those data as data obtained from plant's genome. But I am not very satistified with the ploidy option. Because when you set a ploidy value for control-pair sample, it means the P-copy for both of the control and tumor sample. But in fact not.
    Last edited by dingxiaofan1; 08-31-2014, 11:05 PM.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin


      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
      Yesterday, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    39 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    41 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X