|
|
|
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PCA plots based on nucleotide word frequency (k-mer) of assembled contigs &/or raw re | chayan | Bioinformatics | 3 | 03-02-2017 05:28 AM |
| What's the best way to identify the taxonomy of assembled genomes? | fibar | Metagenomics | 1 | 03-21-2016 04:03 AM |
| Assembled contigs vs short reads | vanillasky | Bioinformatics | 5 | 02-04-2015 01:05 PM |
| Low mapping percentage of reads on assembled contigs | morning latte | Bioinformatics | 20 | 03-23-2014 09:01 AM |
| 23andme raw Illumina intensity reads | rworthi | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-01-2011 08:29 PM |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-26-2017, 09:57 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Location: India Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
|
raw illumina reads or assembled contigs for Taxonomy
Hello!
I am having whole genome sequenced metagenomic data that is assembled using meta-velevt. I want to check taxonomic classification using MgRAST. I need to know that whether I should use raw reads or assembled contigs for taxonomy classification as I am interested in showing functional annotation using assembled contigs. Please help me in clearing this confusion that which is better way for taxonomy classification; raw reads or assembled contigs? Best regards |
|
|
|
07-28-2017, 11:03 AM
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Location: Walnut Creek, CA Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,707
|
Assembled contigs data should be much better than raw reads, if available.
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| contigs, metagenomics, raw reads, taxonomy |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
