![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PCA plots based on nucleotide word frequency (k-mer) of assembled contigs &/or raw re | chayan | Bioinformatics | 3 | 03-02-2017 05:28 AM |
What's the best way to identify the taxonomy of assembled genomes? | fibar | Metagenomics | 1 | 03-21-2016 04:03 AM |
Assembled contigs vs short reads | vanillasky | Bioinformatics | 5 | 02-04-2015 01:05 PM |
Low mapping percentage of reads on assembled contigs | morning latte | Bioinformatics | 20 | 03-23-2014 09:01 AM |
23andme raw Illumina intensity reads | rworthi | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-01-2011 08:29 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: India Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hello!
I am having whole genome sequenced metagenomic data that is assembled using meta-velevt. I want to check taxonomic classification using MgRAST. I need to know that whether I should use raw reads or assembled contigs for taxonomy classification as I am interested in showing functional annotation using assembled contigs. Please help me in clearing this confusion that which is better way for taxonomy classification; raw reads or assembled contigs? Best regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Location: Walnut Creek, CA Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,706
|
![]()
Assembled contigs data should be much better than raw reads, if available.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
contigs, metagenomics, raw reads, taxonomy |
Thread Tools | |
|
|