SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Metagenomics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reducing contamination in 16s PCR for metagenomic library prer roshanbernard Sample Prep / Library Generation 2 04-15-2015 07:05 AM
Exome sequencing DNA from FFPE tissue JER Illumina/Solexa 4 11-01-2014 07:56 PM
DNA sequencing and RNA contamination yumee SOLiD 1 06-10-2013 07:07 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2017, 01:04 AM   #1
KateShepard
Junior Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 5
Default 16S sequencing tissue - host DNA contamination

Dear all,

We are planning to use human/mouse intestinal tissues/biopsies for V4 microbiome sequencing. I am worried that the large amount of host DNA from the tissue will result in amplification of host mitochondrial DNA.

Does anyone have experience of V4 sequencing of tissue samples or biopsies, and if so is there usually a high proportion of mitochondrial sequences present? Are there any strategies to reduce host mitochondrial amplification?

Thanks for your advice,
Kate
KateShepard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 03:28 AM   #2
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,766
Default

Someone else will comment on experimental tricks to mitigate this issue but I wanted to mention BBSplit from BBMap suite which is designed for exactly this bioinformatics task. You can find the thread for BBSplit here.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 10:47 AM   #3
thermophile
Senior Member
 
Location: CT

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 233
Default

The 515F/806R primers that are out there (Caparosso or Kozich primers) are designed to be biased against chloroplast and mitochondria. My tricks for tissues are use a ton of DNA because most of what you are measuring is host, also spike in a tiny amount of non-illumina/non-barcoded 515f/806r
__________________
Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.
thermophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 09:00 AM   #4
adam.geber
Member
 
Location: United States

Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 40
Default

Hi thermophile,

Can you clarify the purpose of spiking in the non-barcoded primers to minimize host mitochondrial contamination? Wouldn't you expect these to bind equally well to the bacterial V4 region?
adam.geber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
contamination, microbiome, mitochondrial dna, tissue, v4 16s

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO