![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Kallisto good for identifying non-coding RNA in a RNAseq data? | praina10 | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 12-04-2018 03:04 PM |
visualisation of RNAseq (kallisto to IGV) | KamilSJaron | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-12-2016 08:52 AM |
Trimming paired end RNAseq - Trimmomatic | sjeschonek | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-14-2014 12:52 PM |
Variant Calling from paired end RNAseq data | ron128 | Bioinformatics | 2 | 03-30-2013 01:33 AM |
Problems with TopHat and Paired End RNASeq | quique_vzquez | Bioinformatics | 2 | 12-14-2012 09:30 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Spain Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi All,
i have a paired-end bulk RNAseq generated with UMIs in order to reduce duplicates from PCR Since now, i used my own piepeline with STAR + UMI_tools to deal with the UMIs and generate a "clean duplicates " bam file, but I wnat to know if kallisto is able to deal with this data I have three fastq's : left and right paired-end FASTQs and one FASTQ for the UMIs. I used kallisto in pseudobam mode, first generating my batch file #id umi file1 file2 sample UMI_001.fastq.gz B_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz B_R2_001.fastq.gz And then running kallisto in this way kallisto pseudo --index=/home/Genomes/Transcriptome_g1k_v37_kallisto_index -o kallisto_output -b batch.txt --umi -t 20 2>&1 | tee log.txt However, it seems that Kallisto with umi option is only capable to deal with single-end Am I right or maybe I forgot anything? Any ideas will be highly aprreciated Kind Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
kallisto, rnaseq, umi |
Thread Tools | |
|
|