RIN vs Volume?

hbt · 05-02-2012, 02:14 AM

I have a set of RNA samples prepared for RNAseq, however the RIN values and total volume on a few of the samples are less than ideal (<7.0 RIN and ~1.5ug total RNA) per sample

I have now produced a second set of samples (direct biological repeat) with much better RIN values (~8.6) but still low volume of total RNA.

My question is whether I would get a better set of results by combining the two samples, thereby reducing the RIN value to and average of the two samples but providing the sequencing centre with a much greater volume of RNA to library prep from? (and presumable reducing the number of duplicates). Or do I just have the second set of samples sequenced as they are the best quality samples I have available?

In other words, which has a greater affect on the quality, coverage level and level of duplicates of the dataset? RIN value or total volume?

The first set of samples also had some poor 260/230 ratio values, does this have much affect on the RNAseq chemistry and could it compromise the quality of the results further?

The samples are to sequenced (single end 50bp) on 1/3 of an illumina Hiseq2000 lane each, following RiboMinus treatment

any thoughts would be greatly appreciated

Thank you

hbt · 05-02-2012, 02:59 AM

Sorry, have re-posted in correct forum (Sample Prep / Library Generation)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RIN values for RNAseq	pogaora	RNA Sequencing	14	07-15-2014 10:18 AM
RIN of 6- should I run sample?	Noa	Sample Prep / Library Generation	3	03-05-2012 12:58 PM
RNASeq from total RNA with a RIN under 8	jo_mason	Sample Prep / Library Generation	2	11-17-2011 07:27 PM
Introductions - High volume data acquisition and analysis	msuraweera	Introductions	4	07-05-2010 06:48 AM
Elution volume after A-tailing?	greigite	Illumina/Solexa	2	11-01-2009 02:45 PM

05-02-2012, 02:14 AM	#1
hbt Member Location: UK Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 20	RIN vs Volume? I have a set of RNA samples prepared for RNAseq, however the RIN values and total volume on a few of the samples are less than ideal (<7.0 RIN and ~1.5ug total RNA) per sample I have now produced a second set of samples (direct biological repeat) with much better RIN values (~8.6) but still low volume of total RNA. My question is whether I would get a better set of results by combining the two samples, thereby reducing the RIN value to and average of the two samples but providing the sequencing centre with a much greater volume of RNA to library prep from? (and presumable reducing the number of duplicates). Or do I just have the second set of samples sequenced as they are the best quality samples I have available? In other words, which has a greater affect on the quality, coverage level and level of duplicates of the dataset? RIN value or total volume? The first set of samples also had some poor 260/230 ratio values, does this have much affect on the RNAseq chemistry and could it compromise the quality of the results further? The samples are to sequenced (single end 50bp) on 1/3 of an illumina Hiseq2000 lane each, following RiboMinus treatment any thoughts would be greatly appreciated Thank you

05-02-2012, 02:59 AM	#2
hbt Member Location: UK Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 20	Sorry, have re-posted in correct forum (Sample Prep / Library Generation)