![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
amplicon sequencing on MiSeq | nancysch | Illumina/Solexa | 20 | 03-11-2015 11:29 AM |
Library prep MiSeq | Rüdiger | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 02-03-2014 07:25 AM |
is Microseal B necessary for MiSeq library prep? | helico93561 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 11-26-2013 08:15 PM |
Library prep protocol for 16s rRNA sequencing by MiSeq | Genetics Kitty | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 11-21-2013 06:56 AM |
Fluidigm PCR amplicon Library prep | yog77 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 10-30-2012 05:36 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Birmingham, UK Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hey everyone,
I hope someone can help . I'm trying to preform amplicon sequencing on the Miseq. I'm using a custom target specific primer with the linker adapter to then follow the Illumina 16S library prepartion protocol. I'm struggling with the sensitivity of the inital PCR which isn't comparable with the level I managed to achieve with the target specific primer without the linker ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: INDIA Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi,
Actually we prepared library for 16s for illumina miseq got good amount of amplification but we dint compare with the primer without the illumina tags. now i think from your question that we should once compare both. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Perth Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 55
|
![]()
dear clmcmurray,
Yes, when ever you use fusion-primers you suck efficiency out of the PCR and this can have a lot of impact on low-template samples. My advice would be to use standard and fusion primers and run both on qPCR (with sybr) to see how much of a 'shift' you are getting. And see how much input template you can put into your reaction before it becomes a problem (i.e you run out or it is inhibitory). One option is to do the fusion PCR and spike in 10% of standard primer - this may help your PCR get off the ground (these products will not cluster downstream) The last option is to use a ligation based approach to library build. There is strengths and weaknesses to each of these approaches - best of luck. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|