![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
unmapped reads with ssaha2 | sammy07 | Bioinformatics | 2 | 10-22-2012 03:23 AM |
BWA - unmapped reads | Adamo | Bioinformatics | 23 | 02-22-2012 10:12 PM |
Velvet for unmapped reads | leeht | Bioinformatics | 1 | 11-20-2010 05:39 PM |
bfast for unmapped reads | Protaeus | Bioinformatics | 2 | 11-17-2010 03:35 PM |
% unmapped reads | bioinfosm | Illumina/Solexa | 8 | 07-05-2010 01:36 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: taiwan Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Hi All,
In a normal run, we have 85% pass filter, then probably 80% mappable reads. Any idea what the good quality un-mappable reads are?? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 693
|
![]()
1. Overestimated base quality. The reads are bad in fact.
2. Some aligners apply filters before alignment (e.g. polyA). 3. Some aligners may drop reads with extremely high copy number 4. The reference genome is imperfect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|