SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confidence Intervals with Cuffdiff v2.2.1 kiwistew Bioinformatics 0 11-15-2014 06:37 PM
Cufflinks FPKM and confidence intervals - how to tell if the gene is expressed or not sindrle Bioinformatics 1 03-26-2014 07:00 AM
Weird confidence intervals from Cuffdiff seeker Bioinformatics 5 02-27-2014 02:01 AM
Cuffdiff Results confidence help himanshu04 Bioinformatics 6 05-10-2013 05:53 AM
Cufflinks FPKM Confidence Intervals--Sources of Variability mrbirdy857 Bioinformatics 0 03-07-2012 05:35 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2016, 07:30 AM   #1
human_urostor
Junior Member
 
Location: York, UK

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Default Cuffdiff confidence intervals - relative quantitation

Hi all,

I have not found any answers to this kind of question anywhere so I have to ask.
I've done RNA-seq and analyzed it in tophat/cuffdiff (then cummeRbund but this is irrelevant here). I also did RT-qPCR on some genes to cross-validate my findings. My reference gene for RT-qPCR was one that was moderately, evenly expressed in all my samples (judging from FPKM). The expression level of all of my other genes was therefore noted as a fraction of the expression level of my reference gene in the same sample (RQ).

To make a figure comparing the results from those two methods, I want to present the expression levels for genes of interest from RNA-seq as fractions of expression level of my reference gene too.

My problem is: how to calculate the uncertainty in the relative FPKM value? From the research I have done, if FDR is left at 0.05, cuffdiff reports 95% confidence intervals calculated as in this paper: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.../1026.abstract

I have found two methods of calculating uncertainty when dividing two values.
Method one: http://www.math-mate.com/chapter34_4.shtml (subsection "Division with two numbers with large errors long method")
Method two (let R be the relative expression): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propag...ce_measurement

The problem with the first one is that (using my mathematical common sense) I would get a 95%*95%=90% CI, the resulting uncertainties seem too huge, and it seems not to be supported by any literature. The problem with the second method is that I need to use standard deviation, and the 95% CI is not exactly the SD.

I would appreciate any help.
human_urostor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
confidence interval, cuffdiff, cufflinks, rt-qpcr, standard deviation

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO