Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Illumina paired end adapter contamination problem Gazaldeep Illumina/Solexa 5 11-23-2016 10:15 AM
GBS Adapter Titration Problem - different Enyzms - no Reference Genome bioballs Sample Prep / Library Generation 6 10-31-2014 09:20 AM
What is this adapter? jaavedm Illumina/Solexa 0 12-19-2013 10:06 AM
adapter yueli Illumina/Solexa 0 11-15-2013 02:48 AM
454 problem with adapter trimming and MIDs OllyBolly 454 Pyrosequencing 4 10-23-2012 04:02 PM

Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2017, 05:44 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
Question Adapter multimer problem

Hi all,

I am trying to trouble-shoot a problem I am having with my library prep.

I am preparing samples following Meyer & Kircher (2010) for Illumina sequencing with home-made adapters identical to Illumina's.

Using an input of 200ng of sheared DNA, I am getting very low library yields and strange dimer mutlimer's (see attached bioA results).

I have been using SPRI beads to clean up between steps and after PCR, but the smaller peaks are still coming through, as are some larger peaks.

Any ideas what could be causing this? I have double checked my DNA (definitely 200ng going in, and properly sheared) and my SPRI beads (working as expected on DNA ladders). My next best guess was that the blunt-end repair and/or phosphorylation reaction is not working properly? Perhaps degraded ATP or enzymes?

Any help would be really appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 170824_2_EGRAM_Sample11.jpg (50.2 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg 170824_2_EGRAM_Sample12 (1).jpg (50.2 KB, 19 views)
LozWhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2017, 10:08 AM   #2
Location: United States

Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 40

Can you elaborate on the protocol and conditions (e.g. how many cycles of PCR) that you're using? Do you have a positive control reaction alongside your samples, and if so are you seeing low yield for that library as well?
adam.geber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 01:05 PM   #3
Junior Member
Location: Denmark

Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 7

It would also be informative with bioanalyzer profiles showing: a) input (the 200 ng) alone and no library prep, b) library prep with input but no adapters, c) library prep with adapter but no input, d)-f) library preps with 10x fold dilutions (1x, 0.1x, 0.01x) of the adapter, and finally g) your dna together with a "standard" commercial adapter using standard protocol.

Even though you are sure that everything "is fine" (mass and that it is covarized correctly etc) many things might have gone wrong that you did not think of - the controls above might point to steps that are not optimal.
Good luck.
provirus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2017, 12:25 AM   #4
Genetic Librarian
Location: Europe

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 31

My wild guess would be on low ligation efficacy, giving the final PCR no target to amplify.
If that is true, you can check that by quantifying your library by Qubit and by qPCR (e.g. Kapa library quant for Illumina). Normally, with a ligation efficacy of ~50%, your Qubit value would be twice as high as your qPCR value. If your library does not contain adapters (or very little), qPCR value should be waaaaay lower.
Genetic Librarian is offline   Reply With Quote

adapter dimers, bioanalzer, genomic, illumina, multimer

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO