Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 16S triplicates

    I often see in studies that whenever people prepare samples for 16S sequencing there's often a line which says that each sample was amplified in triplicates.
    Why?

    Is there any paper out there which explains the need for having 16S samples in triplicates? I couldn't find anything informative...

    I understand why somebody would make triplicates in cases where the amplification for that sample would fail due to technical issues. You'd end up with less samples and have to repeat some maybe, but from an analysis point of view, is there really a need?
    Is it to potentially average out the variation caused during amplification or sequencing? Any papers showing this effect?

    It's not an issue if your sample size is small, but if you are dealing with 1000s of samples, it does get quite costly in terms of PCR/adapter oligo synthesis and PCR mix quantities.
    Just trying to avoid unnecessary cost...
    Last edited by Guest; 08-12-2016, 09:12 AM.

  • #2
    You should amplify your sample more than once because the seqs that get amplified in the first few rounds of amplification will dominate the amplicion pool. Since this is random, more common seqs should be among the first amplified but sometimes they aren't. The more reactions you initialize the more often you should see the "true" most abundant seqs being the most abundant at the end of PCR.

    To minimize costs, you can reduce reaction volumes.

    Google "16s triplicate pcr" for lots of papers to cite.

    *"true" is a very lofty goal for 16S surveys but lets just go with it)
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by thermophile View Post
      You should amplify your sample more than once because the seqs that get amplified in the first few rounds of amplification will dominate the amplicion pool. Since this is random, more common seqs should be among the first amplified but sometimes they aren't. The more reactions you initialize the more often you should see the "true" most abundant seqs being the most abundant at the end of PCR.

      To minimize costs, you can reduce reaction volumes.

      Google "16s triplicate pcr" for lots of papers to cite.

      *"true" is a very lofty goal for 16S surveys but lets just go with it)
      Thanks for the answer. I am not looking for papers to cite, but for papers which speak for using more than one PCR reaction for 16S sequencing.

      If this particular case of PCR template bias is a thing, how come just three reactions would be enough to solve this issue? This would be heavily dependent on the complexity of the template DNA. I would imagine that in this case you'd need way more PCR reactions for soil samples than for human gut samples as an example. Yet studies on both settle for just 3 replicate reactions.

      There are countless 16S seq protocols which use triplicate reactions yet almost none of them explain why, not even if a single reference.

      The only paper I found which tries to look at triplicate vs. single reactions:
      Evaluating Bias of Illumina-Based Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Profiles
      Katherine Kennedy, Michael W. Hall, Michael D. J. Lynch, Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb, and Josh D. Neufeld
      Appl. Environ. Microbiol. September 2014 80:18 5717-572
      2
      says:
      Pooling of triplicate amplifications was first proposed to decrease PCR bias introduced by stochastic fluctuations in amplification efficiencies (drift) (3). However, the impact of pooling has not been demonstrated previously.
      which I found is incredibly mindblowing that researchers were following this triplicate pooling practice for years without any evidence that it really helps??? Because this paper only indicates that it is very situation and could help mostly with very similar samples, to sort of reduce noise in the data.
      Continuing:
      Although one would predict that pooling PCR amplifications might contribute distinct representation from low-abundance “rare biosphere” organisms, we did not detect any significant differences in key alpha diversity metrics (e.g., Shannon, Chao1, and numbers of OTUs) between pooled and individual amplicon data for each sample (data not shown).
      As a reason for pooling, this study cites a paper from 1998 which highlights template bias in a simple DNA mix yet actually doesn't show anything on replicating PCR reactions:
      Bias in Template-to-Product Ratios in Multitemplate PCR
      Martin F. Polz and Colleen M. Cavanaugh
      Appl. Environ. Microbiol. October 1998


      I'm just baffled at the lack of evidence for this practice. Figured that by now somebody could have at least taken different mock community (increasing in complexity) and amplified it in several reactions and different numbers of pools to demonstrate this particular effect, given the advance in sequencing as well as computational methods for analyses we just witnessed. Multiple companies boast about these new polymerases with decreased error rates and biases. I would find it very weird all these advances would not impact this particular pooling practice.
      Last edited by Guest; 08-15-2016, 04:08 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think this may be one of the papers you're seeking out: Sequence Depth, Not PCR Replication, Improves Ecological Inference from Next Generation DNA Sequencing

        The authors assess the relationship between pooled PCR replicates and diversity metrics for 16S profiling on both the 454 and the MiSeq and show little benefit to replicate PCR.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
        • seqadmin
          Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
          by seqadmin



          The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

          Avian Conservation
          Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
          03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
        0 responses
        50 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X