SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cuffdiff: use merged.gtf from cuffmerge or combined.gtf from cuffcompare? turnersd Bioinformatics 21 10-02-2014 03:41 AM
Compare "-GTF" and "-GTF-guide" of cufflink options jiyan Bioinformatics 1 01-23-2014 08:42 AM
GFF to GTF, and GTF to GRanges objects lewewoo Bioinformatics 2 04-03-2012 02:52 PM
Cufflinks' computation of FPKM for --GTF and --GTF-guide estimation burt Bioinformatics 0 08-23-2011 11:59 PM
cuffcompare only generates .gtf.tmap and .gtf.refmap? julio514 Bioinformatics 4 07-15-2011 04:18 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2012, 07:49 PM   #1
masterpiece
Member
 
Location: malaysia

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 40
Default cufflinks : difference in --GTF and --GTF-guide result

Hi all,


I've run transcriptome data analysis on bacteria samples. However, I'm puzzle on expression result differences between --GTF and --GTF-guide option used when run cufflinks. All parameters that I've used to run both sets are the except for cufflinks, one with --GTF and the other --GTF-guide. Here is the "isoforms.fpkm_tracking" from both run

cufflinks with --GTF option

Quote:
tracking_id class_code nearest_ref_id gene_id gene_short_name tss_id locus length coverage FPKM FPKM_conf_lo FPKM_conf_hi FPKM_status
PL0001.t01 - - - - NC_006350 0-1116 1116 54.9354 90.6693 83.0938 98.2448 OK
PL0002.t01 - - - - NC_006350 1160-2375 1215 39.0997 65.3895 59.2786 71.5004 OK
PL0003.t01 - - - - NC_006350 3113-5096 1983 8.92195 15.1043 12.8893 17.3193 OK
PL0005.t01 - - - - NC_006350 5868-7209 1341 33.7041 56.7591 51.3899 62.1284 OK
PL0006.t01 - - - - NC_006350 7527-8013 486 260.334 428.281 398.744 457.818 OK
PL0010.t01 - - - - NC_006350 13451-13862 411 53.5034 88.5618 72.9061 104.217 OK
PL0009.t01 - - - - NC_006350 12162-13380 1218 27.5019 46.1215 40.9969 51.2461 OK
PL0011.t01 - - - - NC_006350 14009-14462 453 181.027 309.998 283.268 336.728 OK
PL0012.t01 - - - - NC_006350 14616-15096 480 73.6868 122.777 106.793 138.762 OK
cufflinks with --GTF-guide option

Quote:
tracking_id class_code nearest_ref_id gene_id gene_short_name tss_id locus length coverage FPKM FPKM_conf_lo FPKM_conf_hi FPKM_status
PL0001.t01 - - - - NC_006350 0-1116 1116 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0002.t01 - - - - NC_006350 1160-2375 1215 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0003.t01 - - - - NC_006350 3113-5096 1983 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0005.t01 - - - - NC_006350 5868-7209 1341 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0006.t01 - - - - NC_006350 7527-8013 486 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0007.t01 - - - CUFF.160 NC_006350 8394-10668 2274 0 0 0 0 LOWDATA
PL0008.t01 - - - CUFF.160 NC_006350 10664-12158 1494 0 0 0 0 LOWDATA
PL0009.t01 - - - CUFF.160 NC_006350 12162-13380 1218 0 0 0 0 LOWDATA
PL0010.t01 - - - - NC_006350 13451-13862 411 0 0 0 0 OK
PL0011.t01 - - - CUFF.160 NC_006350 14009-14462 453 0 0 0 0 LOWDATA
And why some of the genes have FPKM of "0" but at the same time it gives FPKM_status as "OK"?


- kamal
masterpiece is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
--gtf, --gtf-guide, cufflink

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO