SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tophat, --mate-inner-dist and variable length reads dawe Bioinformatics 2 01-20-2012 04:47 AM
how --mate-inner-dist and --mate-std-dev affect the tophat mapping result liuxq Bioinformatics 0 11-06-2011 08:53 PM
tophat -r mate inner distance option ssseq Bioinformatics 2 01-10-2011 05:15 AM
Tophat and cufflinks mate-inner-dist option combiochem Bioinformatics 2 04-22-2010 05:02 PM
tophat -r mate inner distance mgogol RNA Sequencing 0 09-11-2009 01:41 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2010, 07:02 PM   #1
Gangcai
Member
 
Location: Shanghai, China

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 30
Default How does inner distances(--mate-inner-dist and --mate-std-dev) work in tophat?

I am confused about the inner distance setting. From the manual file, it should be set to (fragementlength-2*readslength , eg: 300-2*50=100). But if the distance counting is based on genome location, then the distance between the pairs should be (fragementlength-2*readslength+inserted_introns_length). Does anybody know how tophat manage the intron insertion?
Gangcai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 10:15 AM   #2
Boel
Member
 
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Default

I think that the mate inner distances is set in order to detect whether the mates are in different exons etc. That is, if the distance is much larger/smaller than the 200 (300-2*50) that the software has been told to expect, something interesting might be going on.
Boel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 04:32 AM   #3
snp_analyser
Junior Member
 
Location: Philadelphia

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Question

I'm trying different settings of inner distance for my experiments. Anybody out there with the answer as to which value is good?
snp_analyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 05:32 AM   #4
Bio.X2Y
Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 46
Default

Hi snp_analyser. I'm afraid there is no good value - the inner distances depend on the sizes of your fragments and the lengths of your reads, which are experiment specific.

We typically use a tool like Bowtie to help us find our fragment sizes empirically. We run a paired-end alignment with Bowtie, using default parameters for -I and -X. We then examine the output to see, in general, how far apart the reads in a pair as aligned. This indicates the mate inner distance.

In terms of terminology, the "gap" or "inner distance" is the distance between the aligned reads (not counting the reads themselves). The "insert size", on the other hand, includes the reads themselves, so can be thought of as the "fragment size".

If you look at Bowtie output, the alignment position of a read is the position of the first base in the read (from the perspective of the forward reference strand). This means that if you subtract the alignment positions of the two reads in a pair, the result is actually "inner distance" + "read length". So you will need to subtract the read length to get the inner distance.

You should probably write (or find) a script to do this for you to ensure you examine enough pairs to get a representative feel for the value. Our data typically shows a normally distributed inner distance.
Bio.X2Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 05:53 AM   #5
snp_analyser
Junior Member
 
Location: Philadelphia

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks for the detailed reply!
snp_analyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
mapping, software

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO