SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low bacterial RIN values Tom_C Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 02-10-2016 04:15 AM
Advice needed: low RIN for miRNA sequencing ZoeG RNA Sequencing 0 07-15-2014 03:48 PM
Low RIN of plant RNA and high abundaces of rRNA. yonne Sample Prep / Library Generation 6 10-03-2013 12:22 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2019, 11:27 AM   #1
Micro151086
Junior Member
 
Location: Sheffield

Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 3
Default High RIN low DV200?? Can anybody shed some light?

I've recently sent off E. coli RNA samples for RNA-seq. The company we have used for sequencing have replied and said all samples failed QC due to degradation. I am looking at the Tapestation values and some of these samples have a RIN up to 9.5 but then a DV200 of 25. I believe this is due to the large distinct band at approximately 95 bp- (no smearing!) which I believed were tRNA. I am now unsure as to whether to proceed with sequencing as they cannot guarantee sequencing results. Has anyone had experience of such a contrast in RIN and DV200 numbers previously? And then gone on to successfully perform the sequencing?
Micro151086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2019, 08:43 PM   #2
luc
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 415
Default

The presence of a prominent short fragment band indicates that degradation is not the problem. Bacterial RNA-seq obviously will not make use of poly-A enrichment and thus is not very sensitive to degradation anyhow.
We have not run into a 95 nt RNA band before though.
I would suggest to post the tapestation trace here.
luc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2019, 01:24 AM   #3
Micro151086
Junior Member
 
Location: Sheffield

Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 3
Default

Thank you for the reply. I've added some images that will hopefully shed some light on the situation. Many thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RNA total.jpg (66.0 KB, 18 views)
Micro151086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2019, 11:08 AM   #4
UCan'tBcereus
Member
 
Location: New England

Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 11
Default

Hi Micro151086,

it looks like you have a lot of tRNA in your samples. tRNA is usually in that size range.
I have a few questions.

What Extraction method are you using? Some kits have specific modifications you can make to reduce the amounts of tRNAs that make it through the extraction process if you are not iterated in sequencing them.

Did you plan on doing any ribodepletion? If the sequencing company does, what kind of kit will they use for it? Some ribodepletion methods target tRNAs as well as rRNA, so your problems might be solved there.

And What kind of Kit are they using for Library Prep?

There still might be ways to remove these bands before library prep. If your samples are of high enough concentration, then you could do a bead cleanup with AMpure RNAclean beads at a low bead:sample ratio to remove them. Of course this will lead to extra sample handling and possibly some degradation.

The same idea could be applied post cDNA synthesis as well. Most RNASeq Library Prep kits will have cleanups of after cDNA synthesis. You could lower these bead: sample ratios to help remove the cDNA that would be synthesized from the tRNAs. The only potential problem would be if your tRNAs outcompete your mRNAs and most of your cDNA is from tRNA.

Hope this is helpful!
UCan'tBcereus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO