Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Variant calling from paired/unpaired reads

    I just happened upon a couple question threads in various places that warn against using both paired and non-paired reads for SNP calling.




    It appears that paired and unpaired reads are on two different playing fields as far as their mapping quality, which makes sense, and this makes a difference in inferring SNPs downstream. I've tried looking for more information about this and potential ways to overcome it, but I'm not really seeing anything.

    I thought I would pose the question to this forum and see what more knowledgeable people can explain. Namely, a more detailed explanation of this problem would be nice for those of us who don't know a ton about what is going on under the hood of various variant calling pipelines (e.g., samtools and GATK). Is it possible to overcome this issue and take advantage of both paired and unpaired (i.e., single-end sequencing or pairs broken upstream)? Are there tools that can account for this?

    Any thoughts are appreciated. I have some datasets where using broken pairs would be great, rather than just ignoring them.

    Cheers,
    Daren

  • #2
    Hi Daren,

    When I wrote a variant caller, I used both paired and unpaired reads; properly paired reads were simply given greater weight. The result was better than when ignoring unpaired reads. I suspect that it made little difference except in places with low coverage or near structural variations, but I never analyzed exactly where it made a difference.

    I don't know how other programs handle variants in paired vs unpaired reads, but I believe the best method is to include all available information, and just weight it appropriately if some pieces of information have lower confidence than others. The difference in value between paired and unpaired reads varies greatly depending on insert size, genome complexity, ploidy, and read length; it's possible that these guidelines were developed for 2x36bp human sequencing, which would be utterly irrelevant to 1x250bp bacterial sequencing, for example. Or 2x150bp human resequencing, for that matter. Guidelines that Broad publishes are generally going to be human-centric (and thus deal with large, repetitive, diploid genomes), and guidelines that anyone publishes are going to relate to the technology common at the time.
    Last edited by Brian Bushnell; 05-03-2015, 01:59 PM.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
    • seqadmin
      Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
      by seqadmin



      The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

      Avian Conservation
      Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
      03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
    0 responses
    10 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
    0 responses
    51 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
    0 responses
    68 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X