![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cufflinks merging more than one transcript on bacterial genomes | Noa | Bioinformatics | 2 | 01-24-2012 01:33 PM |
Cufflinks merging more than one transcript on bacterial genomes | Noa | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 01-24-2012 06:41 AM |
NGS data for known bacterial genomes | ojy | Bioinformatics | 1 | 11-02-2011 06:21 AM |
Grab bacterial genomes from NCBI | ElMichael | General | 0 | 03-09-2011 08:31 AM |
Metagenomic Studies of Viral and Bacterial Infections using 2nd Generation Pyrosequen | SoftGenetics | Vendor Forum | 0 | 10-16-2009 11:09 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: texas,us Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Hi All
I was intending to map SOLID reads to the viral and bacterial genomes, and was thinking if i can use the same indices as mentioned in the Bfast manual, or do i need to create new ones? After reading under advanced topics in the manual, i felt that using the same indices might just be stringent. Can someone throw some more light on this? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Nils Homer
Location: Boston, MA, USA Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,285
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Location: 41°17'49"N / 2°4'42"E Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 323
|
![]() Quote:
can help you test how they behave with different error rates, indels, etc... I would strongly suggest to create your own indexes (and compare with the default ones).
__________________
-drd |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|