![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATACseq - large nucleosome peaks | pennypeverell | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 9 | 08-07-2019 09:17 PM |
ATACseq total amplification cycle number | nclrsqr | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 02-21-2018 12:00 PM |
Did low input library and traditional library generated RNAseq data can be compared? | bioinforD | Bioinformatics | 6 | 11-25-2013 07:57 AM |
Library QC- cntrl loci enrichment doesn't match pre and post library generation | yogioner | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 12-03-2012 04:40 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: LA Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 3
|
![]()
We are new to ATAC-Seq. We have performed library validation and several of our samples have produced results similar to those in the image attached. We have a single large peak at 186 bp. Are we okay to go ahead for sequencing? Thanks a lot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: LA Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 3
|
![]()
I forgot to mention that above samples are from FACS mouse cells. We also tried IP instead of FACS, which gave us multiple small peaks, which method shall I go on? Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
|
![]()
We run qc chips for people doing ATACseq with some frequency. I'm never sure what a "good" result is.
I guess you want a large percentage of your DNA to be in the nucleosome monomer size range? But you also want to see some multimers? Not sure. -- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
|
![]()
It seems that your library is over tagmented. Maybe you should decrease the incubation time while performing the tagmentation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]()
I would also say that it is over-tagmented. Which Tn5 are you using, Nextera or home-made? Maybe there is too much Tn5 for the number of cells you are using?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Here is what my ATAC libraries look like. I agree that optimization of tagmentation enzyme amount or time should be considered.
What is you input amount? Are you starting with <50,000 cells? Smaller input amounts will require less enzyme and/or shorter incubation. Last edited by RickC7; 06-14-2018 at 09:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Location: switzerland Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Did you solve this? My libraries look like yours
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Hello, I performed ATACseq preparation of librarys I used 50.000 cells counted by en bauer chamber, and following the protocol of Buen rostro, I did 25 cycles in total of PCR. Can someone tell me if this library looks ok? (attached pdf 1st sample) I am not sure about it. Thank you so much for your help
Best Camila |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
atac, hs d1000, library |
Thread Tools | |
|
|