![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why do some Ns have higher quality values than other Ns? | lcollado | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 08-26-2010 09:17 PM |
Quality Control and Quality Values | agc | Bioinformatics | 4 | 08-24-2010 12:44 AM |
Question about the values of quality | zino | SOLiD | 5 | 05-28-2010 04:31 AM |
Illumina/Solexa quality values | d17 | Bioinformatics | 8 | 04-27-2009 03:48 PM |
sfffile converting quality values | andpet | 454 Pyrosequencing | 2 | 02-12-2009 12:51 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: India Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi All,
We have a couple of questions related to the fastq format and quality values: 1. We have been looking at the quality values of the base 'N' which is essentially an ambiguous base. For such a base, what is the interpretation of its quality value in the fastq file? 2. In some fastq files we have observed that the quality values for base 'N" take a range of values say ASCII 33-40. In these files we have also noticed that some other 'non-ambiguous' bases (which are not N and could be any of A, T, C anf G) have quality values in the same range? In fact some 'N's have a higher quality value that some A, T, C and G! How is this possible? We are trying to understand the meaning of the quality value of N. In such a case, would it make sense to retain the quality values of N? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
base calling, fastq quality numbers |
Thread Tools | |
|
|