![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Velvet,assembly] core dumped occured by runnning velvet | matador3000 | De novo discovery | 0 | 12-17-2011 08:31 AM |
Large K-mer Velvet | NGS_user | De novo discovery | 3 | 06-10-2011 08:59 PM |
Why using k-mer? | papori | De novo discovery | 12 | 03-07-2011 04:30 AM |
remove false positives from less than 17 mer | hpgala | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 02-26-2011 01:30 PM |
Optimal k-mer and N50? | AronaldJ | De novo discovery | 1 | 12-28-2010 10:03 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: singapore Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Hi, I am newbie to NGS. TO assemble a genome i started using velvet. During which I came across a term called 'K-mer' which means the overlapping segment in the reads. I would like to know that if the K-mer length assigned is suppose 21, is it that the overlapping is done exactly for 21 nucleotides at the ends or is it a minimum requirement for the reads to match? Could i kindly know the difference..Thanks in advance..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: NL, Leiden Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 245
|
![]()
Hi!
A read is hashed into your defined k-mers. And only ends are considered of the k-mers, simply because you are stripping the read. Say you have a 10bp read, and a k-mer of 5bp, the hashing of the read into kmers will be; read: ACGATGATAGTA kmer: ACGAT kmer: .CGATG kmer: ..GATGA kmer: ...ATGAT kmer: ....GATAG kmer: .....ATAGT kmer: ......TAGTA The program than finds k-1 overlap (thus here: 5-1=4 bp overlap) at the ends of the k-mers. E.g: ACGAT .CGATG So you find overlap at the ends of the k-mers, but within the reads. Have a look at this poster from Velvet for maybe detailed information; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~zerbino/velvet/velvet_poster.pdf Regards, Boetsie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: singapore Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
|
![]()
thank you..My doubt is cleared..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|