Go Back   SEQanswers > General

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pico green discrepancies schizosaccharomyces Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 10-17-2013 09:37 AM
why nanodrop indicate variable result? fla.fla_8 General 2 11-02-2012 02:26 PM
tophat / bowtie mapping discrepancies vineeth_s Bioinformatics 3 06-10-2011 05:44 AM
Nanodrop vs bioanalyzer for library quantification k-gun12 Illumina/Solexa 1 09-24-2010 08:26 AM
Discrepancies between PicoGreen and qPCR in GA libraries fedora Sample Prep / Library Generation 3 08-25-2009 06:52 AM

Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2013, 12:04 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: New York

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Default Qubit vs Nanodrop discrepancies??

Hi all,

What kind of difference is expected when quantifying dsDNA on a nanodrop vs. Qubit?

Our core facility has generated Qubit values for my cDNA sampels that are consistently 1.3- to 2.3-fold higher than the Nanodrop values that I generated. I've read a lot of reports claiming that Nanodrop consistently overestimates concentration, so I'm a little puzzled by these Qubit results.

Any help is greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
amylee86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 08:50 AM   #2
Junior Member
Location: Santiago-Chile

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1

I have this same problem with my samples!! you managed to solve your doubts? please if your answer is positive, I discuss how? I have this same problem and I think that may be the differences in temperature between rooms!!

thank you
LB2301 is offline   Reply With Quote

cdna, dsdna, nanodrop, quantification, qubit

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO