![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Library Prep for Cancer NGS | seq-ngs | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 02-26-2015 02:01 PM |
Biases in NGS Library Prep | Genohub | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 01-23-2014 01:11 PM |
GBS library prep | rosatoc | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 05-10-2013 08:31 AM |
The NEXTflex™ PCR-Free DNA Sequencing Kit Reduces Bias in NGS Library Prep | Bioo Scientific | Vendor Forum | 10 | 12-20-2012 08:10 AM |
Sample Prep for NGS Library | addyblanch | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 08-30-2012 07:08 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Belgium Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Hi,
I am looking for the best NGS library prep method for RRS/GBS/RAD sequencing of degraded/low/template/ancient DNA ? Any good protocol available to genotype 5-10K SNPs in 100-200 inds reliably starting from already fragmented DNA ? Otherwise best SNP genotyping assay for such low qual DNA samples ? Thanks BG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
Considering input DNA quantity and quality there are two options: 1- Illumina’s genotyping bead arrays. 2- For sequencing based approach preparing Illumina libraries using a low input kit followed by whole genome sequencing or a targeted capture approach (to reduce sequencing requirement). With current kits it is possible to perform capture with very low inputs (pg amount).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Belgium Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Thanks nucacidhunter. Well as I don't have an extensive list of SNPs for my species (some RAD data, but no good flanking regions... I might try a capture method as there is a draft genome (set of contigs/scaffold). What techniques would be cost-efficient ? I heard MyBaits would be good ? Thanks again
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
MyBaits are definitely cost effective and there are some published papers using their baits. For library prep I think ThruPlex DNA-seq could be good option if you have limited material. You may adapt the approach that has been described here: http://rubicongenomics.com/products/...x-dna-seq-kit/ to MyBaits capture protocol.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: Belgium Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Looks promising indeed, how does this lib prep compare to the NEB Ultra DNA kit for instance ? Did you use it already ? Pricing ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
I have not used it, but reviewing manufacturer data, related patents and published literature indicates higher performance for this kit as claimed. Pricing is depend on kit size, as always with larger kits prices gets lower and it is pretty close to NEB kits price. I assume prices would be different depending on location.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
This paper also seems interesting for your application: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0096793
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ancient dna, gbs, illumina, neb, radseq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|