![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
samtools pileup vs mpileup for computing per-base coverage | SamH | Bioinformatics | 5 | 08-10-2011 03:14 PM |
quantitative measure of coverage and reference genome issue | sara_ | General | 1 | 03-14-2011 08:37 PM |
Why are there all these As in my consensus sequence: An issue with samtools pileup | dagarfield | Bioinformatics | 3 | 02-03-2011 11:14 AM |
samtools pileup coverage | guavajuice | Bioinformatics | 4 | 05-27-2010 03:30 PM |
Coverage issue | hersh | Bioinformatics | 0 | 03-18-2009 11:17 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 415
|
![]()
Hi everyone,
I am trying to assess the alignment quality of two aligners. It seems the samtools pileup command does not give data for every position in the genome. Specifically, it does not print low coverage regions - coverage <3 from what I can see. Is there a way to modify this behaviour ? I see the -l FILE at http://samtools.sourceforge.net/samtools.shtml may be helpful? I want to include _all_ positions in the pileup. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 693
|
![]()
No. You have to write a script to do this by yourself.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: wisconsin Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12
|
![]()
there's a good perl API for samtools if you want to go that route. google Bio:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|