![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Size-selection of TruSeq DNA library | ageneheo | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 12-03-2012 09:15 AM |
Size-selection with ScriptSeq v2 RNAseq Library? | Jean | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 11-14-2012 07:37 AM |
Size selection of ChIP-Seq library | OptimusBrien | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 7 | 02-22-2012 01:18 PM |
Library size selection for bacterial RNAseq | whitestein | General | 2 | 08-19-2011 06:36 AM |
Paired End Library Size Selection | GeCKo | 454 Pyrosequencing | 2 | 11-16-2010 08:06 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: New York Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Hi everyone,
Want to size select some Nextera libraries and wondering about everyones preferred method? I have tried Blue Pippin but the cassette % size constraints make this difficult. Moving to trying with gel and want to get an idea of what % of what kind of agarose (e.g. MetaPhor) people are using and running conditions? I am trying to select 150-800bp approximately. Thank you for your feedback! LH |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
josh kinman
Location: Austin Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
|
![]()
Hello Lacquerhead,
I have done a lot of gel size selections with 2% agarose gels which worked well. I used low-melt agarose, and don't think the variety matters too much. If you are selecting down to 150bp you will want to make sure that you let your sample migrate long enough to separate fully from any potential dimers that will be ~120bp. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: New York Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Don't have anything at 120 in these samples, only around 50bp so shouldn't be a problem. Which kit do you use? Ive heard a suggestion to use regular gel extraction kit but with the MinElute columns.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: New York Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Another question is how do you stain the gel, EtBr or something else like SYBR Gold?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
josh kinman
Location: Austin Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
|
![]()
I work at Bioo Scientific, so I just use our reagents.
http://www.biooscientific.com/Illumi...Kit-Components but any gel any gel selection kit should be fine. Both Ethidium Bromide and SYBR Gold will work. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Location: New York Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
How is the efficiency of the kit in terms of ng recovered? In this lot range of 150-800bp? Thanks.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Location: New York Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Does anyone have good protocols for removing fragments larger than 800-1000bp with Ampure XP beads?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
I wonder why you want to size select a Nextera library in 180-800 bp range. If you sequence a library at this size range 80% of reads will be from fragments below 500 bp and hardly any reads from fragments larger than 800 bp.
I do not have a validate protocol but you would need to do a double SPRI. In principal, add 0.48X bead and take the supernatant then add more beads to make the bead ratio 0.8X. I would suggest doing this with sheared DNA if it is available to make sure that your batch of AMPure beads gives desired results. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
josh kinman
Location: Austin Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
|
![]() Quote:
A bead based size selection should have a higher yield than using a gel, and I agree with nucacidhunter in regards to the upper ratio and using fragmented DNA to validate beforehand. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Location: Cambridge Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 116
|
![]() Quote:
QC by bioanalyser, adjust ratios as needed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|