![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New PacBio system: Sequel | SNPsaurus | Pacific Biosciences | 62 | 09-28-2017 05:33 AM |
Sequel System NA12878 Structural Variant Call Set | pacbio | Pacific Biosciences | 0 | 12-06-2016 04:38 PM |
Sequel System Data Release: Arabidopsis Dataset & Genome Assembly | pacbio | Pacific Biosciences | 3 | 09-28-2016 02:52 PM |
PubMed: Digital gene expression analysis of the zebra finch genome. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 04-03-2010 03:02 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Menlo Park, CA Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 84
|
![]()
We’ve just released data from Iso-Seq interrogations of brain tissue from two avian models of vocal learning, Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), sequenced in collaboration with the Erich Jarvis and Olivier Fedrigo labs at the Rockefeller University.
For this data set, we used the Iso-Seq method to characterize the transcriptomes of two birds, with brain total RNA. The two species’ brain samples were barcoded, pooled, and sequenced using 4 SMRT Cells on the Sequel System. An average of ~460,000 reads was generated per SMRT Cell; total sequencing data yields ranged from 6.1 to 7.7 Gb per SMRT Cell. More than 15,000 isoforms were identified in each species, including thousands that had not been previously annotated in each bird and 400 to 500 new genes. Download the data set & read blog post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
I wonder if you could post screenshot of the Run QC for each SMRT Cell detailing productivity, read length, total bases and movie time from SMRT Link as it can be very useful benchmark for sequencing centers and their clients.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: KiwiTeritory Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 19
|
![]()
Could anyone share their Sequel Run QC of a Iso-seq library. PacBio does not seem keen to share details of what lies behinde their polished data.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: San Francisco Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 322
|
![]()
See the attached PDF.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: Hong Kong Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Dear all,
The attached is what we recently done for Iso-Seq application. We are first time to spike-in Sequel SMRT Cell Control Complex 2.0, anyone knows how to interpret its sequencing data? Thanks, Wei ![]() Last edited by weigrc; 09-19-2017 at 01:47 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: San Francisco Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 322
|
![]()
The run looks reasonably good. There are 1593 control reads i.e. its only a very small portion of your data (as it should be), and the polymerase read length and concordance for the control look good, 15105 and 0.85 respectively.
The distribution of polymerase read lengths for your sample is a little lower than for the control, which may indicate the sample isn't of extremely high quality, but it isn't a red flag, given you have 6.56 Gb of raw data. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
Hi Wei, thanks for posting your run results. I wonder what chemistry and software version you have used. Some versions recommends Magbead loading for Iso-seq libraries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Location: Hong Kong Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 46
|
![]() Quote:
Sequel Sequencing Kit: V2 ICS SW: V5.0.0 SMRT Link: V5.0.1 Thanks, Wei |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|