SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BWA aligned pairs read1=XT:A:U, read2=XT:A:R jflowers Bioinformatics 1 07-29-2014 10:06 PM
Read1 and Read2 are not consistent priya Illumina/Solexa 2 07-16-2013 02:42 AM
Paired end- search for complement of Read2 in Read1 flacchy Introductions 9 05-23-2013 06:55 AM
Nextera primers wingtec Illumina/Solexa 0 01-31-2013 12:43 PM
Current read1, index, and read2 primers for HiSeq2000 SeqVicious Illumina/Solexa 1 09-26-2011 02:12 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2013, 02:10 PM   #1
Phage434
Junior Member
 
Location: Boston Ma

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default How do the Nextera Read1 and Read2 primers both work

Does anyone understand how the Nextera Read1 and Read2 primers can work when they both have identical 19 bp regions at the 3' ends?

I would never think about designing a Sanger sequencing primer with that structure, nor a PCR primer. It's hard to believe these primers are possible with normal base composition.

The hinge sequence on Truseq primers has a similar issue, but with "only" 13 bp of identical sequence.
Phage434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 03:20 PM   #2
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 182
Default

The sequencing read primers aren't PCR primers. They're added separately at the beginning of each sequencing read to start the synthesis reaction (ie. Read 1 primer at the start of read 1, read 2 primer at the start of read 2). The templates themselves are also single stranded at this point and anchored to the flow cell by the P5 and P7 Illumina adapters.

The actual primers used in the PCR hybridize to a region upstream of the identical sequence to avoid problems with improper adapter orientation and dimerization.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 07:13 PM   #3
Phage434
Junior Member
 
Location: Boston Ma

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

I understand those things. I still don't understand why a Read 1 promoter does not bind efficiently to the Read 2 site (and vice - versa).
Phage434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 09:36 PM   #4
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 182
Default

It probably does work, but it wouldn't make a difference in sequencing. All of the DNA clusters on the flow cell are single stranded and in same orientation as determined by the flow cell primer. Therefore it's unlikely you will get second read sequences contaminating your first read or vice versa.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 08:01 AM   #5
Phage434
Junior Member
 
Location: Boston Ma

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

I see. To clarify for others, during forward read, the flow cell has only ssDNA, and the Read 1 primer can only bind to the Read 1 site. The other potential binding site is only present in a reverse complement form. After finishing the Read 1 phase, the flow cell is switched to containing the reverse complement of the original ssDNA, cleaving the original ssDNA and washing it away. The Read 2 primer can now bind. So, in principle, the Read 1 an Read 2 primers could be identical, and we would still get directional sequencing.
Thank you.
Phage434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 11:10 PM   #6
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 182
Default

Yep you got it. The adapter sequences themselves are this way by necessity rather than by design. The Nextera enzyme inserts a specific transposed sequence of DNA during the tagmentation process, which forces you to use this sequences as your primer. The way directionality is done is by having two different sets of enzymes charged with different 5' overhangs on the transposed sequence. During PCR the primers enrich only fragments with different overhangs at each end and also add the Illumina adapter primers sequences to both ends.

The story is a bit different with TruSeq adapters. Here the identical sequence is necessary to form the double stranded sequence necessary for adapter ligation. 5' and 3' overhangs are used to add the full Illumina adapter sequence at each end. This improves efficiency over having two separate adapters as all ligated DNA form sequencing compatible product on both DNA strands, so the theoretical efficiency of the TruSeq adapters is 4x that of having two separate double stranded adapters.

Last edited by kcchan; 12-21-2013 at 11:18 PM.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:29 AM   #7
Phage434
Junior Member
 
Location: Boston Ma

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

Point taken, but I believe it is only a factor of two. With adapters A and B you would get all combinations, AA, AB, BA, BB. AB and BA both bind and amplify in the flow cell. This also explains how the Nextera random insertions work, which also yield a similar distribution. Only half of the resulting fragments will bind and form clusters.
Phage434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO