![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Custom SOLID Adapters for RNA-Seq | nbogard | SOLiD | 2 | 12-01-2011 07:19 PM |
Custom barcodes AND Paired end seq readlength | GenomicIBK | SOLiD | 3 | 11-20-2011 07:02 PM |
RNA-Seq: Comparative Analysis of RNA-Seq Alignment Algorithms and the RNA-Seq Unified | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 3 | 07-31-2011 08:08 PM |
RNA-seq Galaxy workflow for PE barcoded samples? | jjw14 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 04-19-2011 01:58 PM |
Custom SAGE with RNA SEQ Kit | moritzhess | RNA Sequencing | 4 | 04-05-2011 03:57 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Hi,
we are planning on setting up our own custom method for RNA-sequencing with barcodes on an Illimina GAII. I've already found some hints in this forum and elsewhere but still have some questions: - My plan is to the use Illumina Small RNA adapters and corresponding PCR primers (like they are displayed at http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...pters+sequence) with and additional barcode of 4-6 nucleotides added to the 5' RNA Adapter. Does anyone have experience with that and wants to share it? - After RT, do I need a second strand synthesis at all? If I get it right, a PCR on the ss-cDNA should do the job and generate a ready-to-use cDNA library with adapters and all. Any help is highly wellcome. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 482
|
![]()
Note it is a very common problem to get uneven distribution of coverage in bar-coded libraries even using the Illumina adaptors. Thus if you are planning on expression analysis I doubt it will be valid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Cambridge, MA Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
|
![]()
Not necessarily- expression analysis packages like edgeR and DESeq have library size correction factors built in to the statistics. If one library is severely under-represented though it will reduce the statistical power of your analysis.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
|
![]() Quote:
If the unequal distribution of barcodes is genome wide, I wouldn't expect severe problems because normalization would be simple. But if there's unequal distribution within the genome (e.g. gene A shows higher coverage than gene B for barcode 1 but lower coverage for the same sample using another barcode) it's more difficult. A probable solution could be to use two barcodes for each sample and take average values or to limit the number of barcodes used to keep overall coverage high. I should add that we are working with bacterial cDNA, thus the reference genome size is not very large, which increases the coverage. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: US Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 21
|
![]()
we tried barcoding the 5'RNA adapter and found significant bias in our small RNA preps. it turns out that RNA Lig I prefers some bases over others. You will need to barcode the 3' adenylated adapter because it utilizes a truncated version of RNA Ligase 2, which does not exhibit as much base preference.
You can design and make these yourself or purchase a set that has already been designed and optimized to eliminate bias. Initially I tried making these myself. Now I purchase the set below. I've done several runs now with multiplexed samples with good results. http://www.biooscientific.com/Detail...tGenSequencing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|