Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 16S V3-V4 Multiplexing >24 samples

    I have a colleague who wants to amplify 16S V3-V4 and then have me multiplex and run on MiSeq. She at this point has 26 samples, but using Illumina's protocol for indexing with Nextera index primers, I can only do 24 samples. We don't want to spend close to $1000 for the 96-sample index set since this is not something that we typically do, and the index primers would likely not get used again. Are there other options for multiplexing >24 samples? We have TruSeq LT single index primers, but again that's only 24 using sets A and B.

    Thanks for any suggestions!

  • #2
    You may consider a 12 base index as described in the article below. Primers designed and ordered through IDT may fit the budget.

    Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walter WA, Berg-Lyons D, Losupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, and Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. PNAS. 108: 4516-4522.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by sweetph3 View Post
      I have a colleague who wants to amplify 16S V3-V4 and then have me multiplex and run on MiSeq. She at this point has 26 samples, but using Illumina's protocol for indexing with Nextera index primers, I can only do 24 samples. We don't want to spend close to $1000 for the 96-sample index set since this is not something that we typically do, and the index primers would likely not get used again. Are there other options for multiplexing >24 samples? We have TruSeq LT single index primers, but again that's only 24 using sets A and B.

      Thanks for any suggestions!
      They are just PCR primers. Just order 1 more primer -- one from the 96 index set from an oligo company. Should cost less than $10.

      --
      Phillip

      Comment


      • #4
        They are just PCR primers. Just order 1 more primer -- one from the 96 index set from an oligo company. Should cost less than $10.
        I thought Nextera index primers had some sort of nucleotide modification. I didn't realize regular primers would work. If so, great! Thanks!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by sweetph3 View Post
          I thought Nextera index primers had some sort of nucleotide modification. I didn't realize regular primers would work. If so, great! Thanks!
          I can tell you we just use normal de-salted oligonucleotides from IDT sometimes for the amplification step after tagmentation. Works fine.

          --
          Phillip

          Comment


          • #6
            If you're just starting out, go dual index



            I'm currently using up our original 12bp indexed primers (Caporaso et.al, index on i7) and have added the i5 indexes from Kozich et.al. So even though the i7 primers have 12bp indexes, I'm only sequencing 8. It's working fine and i no longer have to spend hours trying to shuffle primers for all the different groups that want to multiplex on a single run
            Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
              by seqadmin


              The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
              Today, 07:01 AM
            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X