Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EdgeR DE results of two treatments questions lran2008 Bioinformatics 3 09-05-2013 04:38 AM
edgeR v2.6 vs. v3.2.4 mwheeler Bioinformatics 0 08-11-2013 09:57 AM
edgeR ECHo Bioinformatics 13 04-18-2013 01:01 PM
edgeR wangli RNA Sequencing 4 04-19-2012 06:58 AM
edgeR Puva Bioinformatics 2 05-19-2011 09:04 AM

Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2016, 12:26 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Avignon, France

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Question edgeR questions


I have some questions regarding my RNAseq analysis process via edgeR. I have followed the official book LINK but sometimes it is quite succinct maybe.

1/ how to interpret (or what do we expect to get) when making a geom_boxplot of the count table : log10(value) VS variables(samples) ?

-> I think we expect to have near the same shapes and variability for each samples.

But what if one of the sample differs? And how big has to be the variation to be considered?

At this time I also get “Warning message: Removed 630034 rows containing non-finite values (stat_boxplot).”

I read here that “it is ok to discard the zero values”.
But my table contains 1 019 835 observations. Is it acceptable to remove 630 034 of them? I am not sure to understand.

2/ Then, as suggested by the page 11 of the book I made pre-filtering on my data:

keep <- rowSums(cpm(y)>1) >= 3 
y <- y[keep, , keep.lib.sizes=FALSE]
(By doing this I go from 68 000 contigs to 20 000).

Is it ok to put “3” on the first line since I have 3 replicates for each samples in my design?

I am not to understand what really happen on line 2 via the script y[blabla, ,blabla].

3/ I made the plotBCV. The book is quite unprecise on how to interpret this cloud of points and what to expect.

I also got "Disp = 0.04688 and BCV = 0.2165".

It is said that 40% of biological variability is frequent in human.
I am working on lettuce. What about my Disp and my BCV?
And how to interpret the shape of my plot "BCV VS Average log CPM"?
Is this step really meaningful?

4/ Finally, I questioned a Differential Gene Expression, and making filtering on "False Discovery Rate" and "logFC" :

lrt1 <- glmLRT(fit, contrast=my.contrasts[,"day7dark.vs.day7light"])
topT1 <,dim(table)[0]))
a<-topT1[topT1$FDR <0.05,]
b<-a[a$logFC >0.3,]
Here is a head result:

| | logFC| logCPM| LR | PValue| FDR|
|Lsat_xxxx | 6.34| -0.86 | 135.89 | 0.00 | 0.00|
I am not sure to understand why I am still seeing here very low logCPM (-0.86) although I have already filtered my data sooner
keep <- rowSums(cpm(y)>1) >= 3
Is ti a kind of "mean logCPM" made on all the samples compared here?
If so, I think I have to filter it again and only focus my attention on the best “FDR + logCPM + logFC” looking genes… Am i true ?

I do not know what to do with “LR” in this table. Is it usefull to also filter my genes via LR ?

Thanks a lot for your help.
dr63 is offline   Reply With Quote

edger, filtering, logcpm, non-finite

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO