Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cuffdiff output shows log2(fold change) as infinite

    Hi, I've compared two conditions in cuffdiff (2 reps each). On examining the output, I see in the gene_exp.diff file that some of the XLOC features show 'NOTEST' under the status column, and '-inf' under the log2(fold change) column.

    I've never seen this before, and it's worrying me as it produces weird plots in cummeRbund...

    Any help would be great!

    Best,

    N

  • #2
    log(zero)=-inf

    I think you have 0 as a mean value (between replicates) in first condition (eg Treatment) and a number as mean value (between replicates) in the second condition(eg Control), so:
    log2(FoldChange)=log2(meanTreatment/meanControl)=log2(0/number)=log2(0)=-inf

    For "NOTEST", see the manual here in "Cuffdiff output" section.

    Comment


    • #3
      So this isn't actually a bad thing, so to speak? If that's the case, I would have expected to see this sort of result quite frequently, where one condition has 0 reads mapping to a given gene and the other does have reads mapping.

      I'm still worried/confused though, as when I run my results through cummerbund, and look for sigGenes, I find no genes with p<0.01, whereas looking through the gene_exp.diff I find many...

      Do you know why this might be?

      N

      Comment


      • #4
        When you're looking at the gene_exp.diff are you checking the q-value column or the p-value column? I think cummerbund uses the q-value column, which is correct.

        Also +/- inf fold changes are totally normal. I think cuffdiff used to report either a very large number or a very small number in the past instead of 'inf'. So if you're used to using this program in the past then maybe you were used to those results?
        /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
        Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X