SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DNA 2D Barcoding for Mitochondrial DNA KKaplan Oxford Nanopore 1 04-25-2017 06:20 AM
Hai, I need clear protocol for DNA Barcoding in bacteria lebonahd Metagenomics 3 12-18-2013 02:02 AM
LIMS Made Freely Available to DNA Barcoding Community Geneious Vendor Forum 0 12-07-2010 10:10 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2017, 05:45 AM   #1
lvogel
Junior Member
 
Location: Western Europe

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Question Plant DNA barcoding markers

Hi, I have a general question about DNA barcoding of plants (I just need a brief answer, not a lot of detail). I've heard/read that a combination of matK and rbcL sequences are customarily used to provide the highest resolution of classification, but even with these two, it isn't necessarily to species level. So I was wondering: Can both matK and rbcL be BLAST-ed, or do we need another method? And should you do a certain gene first, to get to e.g., family level, and then narrow it down afterwards, or can you just BLAST everything all at once?
lvogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2017, 03:36 AM   #2
lvogel
Junior Member
 
Location: Western Europe

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Default

I have found a (partial) answer to my own question, by reading a paper involving barcoding of tea samples, which I'm also interesting in doing. It seems that it was enough to confirm the presence of any plant species if even one of the primers yielded sequences with a high enough % identity to references. (Mabye over 99.5%).
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though.
lvogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2017, 12:02 PM   #3
ATϟGC
Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 36
Default

As you have mentioned, plant DNA barcoding to the species level is rather imperfect to put it mildly. Incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization have led to the sharing of chloroplast haplotypes in many taxa. Even if you have complete chloroplast genomes species-level identification with DNA is not possible in many groups due to rampant haplotype sharing.

If you do not have very many sequences to identify and/or if the taxonomic range is small, it is probably preferable to use a cladistic approach to construct a phylogeny with closely related sequences. You could use sequences from your own custom reference library (e.g. species in your study area) or use sequences from a BLAST search. If you have a large number of sequences from a broad range of taxa you might want to use a more high-throughput method like the RDP-naive Bayesian classifier (Wang et al 2007) trained with your own custom database or some other sequence clustering method.
ATϟGC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dna barcodes, plants

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO