![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bwa sampe bam input | avinash | Bioinformatics | 8 | 09-18-2012 09:21 AM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Array: combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expre | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-19-2011 03:50 AM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: Lessons for experimental design and data analysi | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 03-02-2011 03:50 AM |
18bp DNA contaminant in ChIP input sample? | sinapius | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 02-09-2011 12:39 PM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip dat | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-13-2010 03:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: usa Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1
|
![]()
I have a problem for peak calling. Could anyone help me?
After bowtie, I am using MACS to call peaks. There are 12 million unique reads in input, but there are only 4 million unique reads in my IP. The number of peaks called by MACS is not as high as I expected based on ChIP-chip. I am guessing some of the peaks may be masked because of the more reads in input. How could I solve this problem? Any suggestion? I plan to randomly select comparable number of reads from input and call peak again. Does it make sense to do so? If it does, how could I do the job? I do not know how to do it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
chip seq, input, peak, random |
Thread Tools | |
|
|