Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange headers of NextSeq 500 fastq reads azzzkita Illumina/Solexa 7 01-13-2016 02:08 AM
HTseq - count - high ambiguous count rate and reads with missing mate encountered 4galaxy7 Bioinformatics 0 12-14-2015 02:48 AM
Mapping reads to reference genome + count reads of genes cumulonimbus RNA Sequencing 12 10-02-2013 08:07 AM
count reads or count base-pairs yuelics Introductions 3 07-29-2011 05:41 AM
Quantification: count reads or count base pairs? yuelics Bioinformatics 0 07-27-2011 04:48 AM

Thread Tools
Old 01-19-2016, 09:22 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 2
Default NextSeq reads count

Hi all,

I counted the number of reads in the same sample in 2 different ways:

a) On the sequencer (NextSeq), by counting the number of reads identified that passed filter
b) On the server, in the fastq files using the command wc l (total lines) and then dividing the result by 4

The problem is that those two numbers do not match. Shall they match or not? What is the difference? My objective is to get around 50 million reads per sample and I am figuring out which counting option use. Thanks!

PJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:28 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,660

Are you doing adapter trimming on the sequencer? I assume the difference may be explained by reads that passed filter but were trimmed due to presence of adapter/dimers.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote

fastq-file, nextseq, reads

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO