![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unmatched read name error when converting csfasta to fastq with solid2fastq.pl | yksikaksi | Bioinformatics | 2 | 11-06-2011 09:18 PM |
problem converting bam to pileup | crh | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-01-2011 12:35 PM |
Has somebody noticed that BWA' little scirpt solid2fastq.pl has some fatal defeat? | ryuky | Bioinformatics | 3 | 04-23-2011 07:26 PM |
solid2fastq paired-end | m_elena_bioinfo | Bioinformatics | 2 | 07-08-2010 09:11 AM |
Solid2FASTQ | Martin R | Bioinformatics | 3 | 05-27-2010 12:08 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, ITALY Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 99
|
![]()
Hi NGS users,
I always use solid2fastq 0.6.4e (from bfast+bwa-0.6.4e) to convert csfasta2fastq (both single read and paired end) in this way: > solid2fastq -o output -b sample_F3.csfasta sample_F5-P2.csfasta sample_F3_QV.qual sample_F5-P2_QV.qual and it's run perfectly, generating two file (output.read1.fastq and output.read2.fastq) Now, I have SOLiD samples in PE with barcode. But when I run > solid2fastq -o output -b sample_F3_1_23.csfasta sample_F5-BC_1_23.csfasta sample_F3_QV_1_23.qual sample_F5-BC_QV_1_23.qual the program returns me only a single fastq containing only the reads of F5-BC strands. (output.single.fastq) How can I fix this problem? Thanx a lot, ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Nils Homer
Location: Boston, MA, USA Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,285
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, ITALY Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 99
|
![]()
I posted the question to bfast-help.
These are the reads: F3_BC.csfasta >2_62_1595_F3 T33222032200312120022000320022021022000022220300200 >2_63_675_F3 T30223332233222011120303002321220022222232022302223 >2_63_759_F3 T32122302231212321122320322300021031021022202310221 >2_63_1203_F3 T30223300233110010221001112211102131021221222302121 >2_63_1334_F3 T03011300002002020011000212002210033200100001000010 >2_63_1841_F3 T32222332201222021030202202122222222221212222202022 >2_63_1868_F3 T30222102221322320120102022020220101222020220002020 F3_BC_QV >2_62_1595_F3 8 11 15 11 7 5 4 6 4 13 4 4 7 9 22 4 7 5 5 8 11 4 10 4 4 4 4 12 4 18 4 5 7 14 4 6 4 4 4 12 9 5 7 11 4 10 11 8 6 16 >2_63_675_F3 21 5 5 5 5 9 4 7 10 6 4 6 5 9 6 5 4 8 4 5 12 7 5 6 4 23 6 5 4 7 14 11 4 17 9 8 11 10 8 6 17 8 10 7 4 6 12 9 5 5 >2_63_759_F3 24 4 4 10 9 12 5 4 7 4 7 6 10 10 6 5 4 8 13 4 5 11 5 6 11 19 10 5 5 4 7 4 5 16 8 9 15 10 5 6 13 8 4 5 12 7 13 8 16 13 >2_63_1203_F3 18 4 4 16 9 5 6 6 11 4 16 5 4 4 4 20 6 13 26 4 4 8 8 6 13 17 10 27 17 8 6 15 20 7 8 12 20 19 18 8 8 14 4 4 7 5 5 6 25 19 >2_63_1334_F3 19 30 24 20 21 23 18 28 27 27 16 24 26 13 4 4 20 22 7 5 16 4 23 15 8 19 14 4 19 7 16 6 16 4 5 5 9 15 9 8 5 8 13 7 4 13 16 5 4 8 >2_63_1841_F3 6 4 4 8 5 4 4 4 10 4 12 4 5 10 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 7 4 4 12 4 11 7 5 6 4 4 8 11 5 13 6 12 4 4 10 5 9 5 5 7 4 7 8 F5-BC.csfasta >2_62_1595_F5-BC G0200102100000300030000103 >2_63_675_F5-BC G0210222100220203000013012 >2_63_759_F5-BC G0200112101000213220022013 >2_63_1203_F5-BC G2200102210020023030013003 >2_63_1334_F5-BC G0002122002220021030000000 >2_63_1841_F5-BC G0222112122230212203020122 F5-BC_QV >2_62_1595_F5-BC 9 5 4 21 7 5 5 6 7 19 19 11 18 4 5 5 14 10 19 8 12 5 20 4 19 >2_63_675_F5-BC 4 25 14 13 8 6 10 7 6 5 4 7 17 4 6 14 11 8 4 10 6 4 9 15 5 >2_63_759_F5-BC 7 31 6 6 18 9 5 10 7 9 6 17 5 5 18 5 4 4 9 4 5 4 10 10 4 >2_63_1203_F5-BC 14 14 8 20 11 10 14 4 5 4 5 5 21 19 6 5 22 15 21 24 18 4 8 8 15 >2_63_1334_F5-BC 5 20 5 9 11 7 32 6 4 4 4 14 18 7 8 4 6 8 14 9 7 14 10 12 11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Zurich Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
|
![]()
any progress on this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: santiago de compostela, spain Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
![]()
I don't really see why you have to enter both pairs in a single solid2fastq run, since each pair will output a single fastq file. or does solid2fastq perform any kind of extra check when entering single or paired-end data? wouldn't it be easier to call them separately, ie
Code:
solid2fastq -o output sample_F3.csfasta sample_F3_QV.qual solid2fastq -o output sample_F5-P2.csfasta sample_F5-P2_QV.qual |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Nils Homer
Location: Boston, MA, USA Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,285
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Location: India Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
|
![]()
Hi I have bwa-0.5.9/solid2fastq.pl version. I have two files SolF3.csfasta & SolF3_QV.qual which i want to convert in 'fastq'. After running the command as :
perl solid2fastq.pl Sol SolTest I am getting the file SolTest.single.fastq.gz but with no reads in file after i unzip it, whereas i have good and equivalent amount of reads in my input read (*F3.csfasta) and qual (*F3_QV.qual) file. Can someone explain me the reason if ever stuck in similar problem. Strange to say the same command is working fine with another set of file. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Location: santiago de compostela, spain Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
![]()
this thread was about using solid2fastq with barcodes, so I would suggest you to open a new thread asking for help. in it, I guess the first thing you would be noticed is that it is much faster to use the C implementation of solid2fastq rather than the perl script, and that the typical usage command would be something like this:
Code:
solid2fastq -o SolF3 SolF3.csfasta SolF3_QV.qual |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|