SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
high percentage of unclassified sequences on Illumina Volunteer42 Illumina/Solexa 2 11-29-2013 02:01 PM
High duplication percentage klebsiella Illumina/Solexa 2 01-17-2013 04:45 AM
High percentage of N calls in the library apredeus Bioinformatics 2 12-08-2012 03:27 PM
target mapped read percentage eren Illumina/Solexa 0 08-13-2011 10:06 PM
Duplicates percentage in target resequencing Seq84 Illumina/Solexa 5 04-29-2011 06:16 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2016, 04:17 AM   #1
finswimmer
Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 52
Default High percentage of Off-target reads

Hello,
we are using TruSight Capture Kits from Illumina for Targeted Sequencing.

Normally we have around 25% off-target reads within one run. But from time to time there are runs with 75-85% off-target reads resulting in low coverage in the target region.

What can be the reason for that?

Our guess is, that it has something to do with the hybridization or the washing step afterwards. Maybe the washing soluting wasn't on room temperature? Maybe the hybridization time was to long (but we never exceeded the 20h recommended in the manual)? If the hybridization time was to long, than in the first or in the second hybridization?

Have you had similiar problems and found out what the reason was? Any other guess?

fin swimmer
finswimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 10:53 AM   #2
husamia
Member
 
Location: cinci

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 66
Default

it depends what the rest of 75-85% is. Try to size select before sequencing, this gets ride of small fragments <150 that may be lost due to adapter contamination
husamia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 09:12 PM   #3
finswimmer
Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 52
Default

Hello husamia,

we always check the fragment size of our library with a Bioanalyzer. There the library show a normal distribution of the fragment sizes. Also cluster density, cluster passing filter, Q Values, percentage of total aligned reads, the distribution of samples within the library looks fine.

There are only two values that are abnormal:
- the mentioned high percentage of off-target reads
- the concentration of the library after preperation. It's up to 3-4 times higher than normally. That's why we guess it has something to do with the capture or washing step. Either the hybridization probes captured to much or within the washing step to much unspecific region stay in the sample.

So maybe it's possible to check the concentration with Qubit after washing and if it's to high (but what is "to high"?) we can repeat one more wash?

fin swimmer

Last edited by finswimmer; 10-20-2016 at 09:16 PM.
finswimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
coverage, miseq, off-target

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO