![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very Large Mate Pair Libraries | Daytwa | Illumina/Solexa | 7 | 04-21-2015 02:37 AM |
building scaffolds using a contig and mate pair | boetsie | De novo discovery | 37 | 03-09-2014 10:46 PM |
exome enriched mate-pair libraries | upenn_ngs | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 07-29-2011 10:26 AM |
Use of illumina mate pair libraries for scaffolding | glacerda | Bioinformatics | 2 | 07-13-2011 08:35 AM |
454 Mate pair naming convention, for input to BAMBUS | aarthi.talla | Bioinformatics | 4 | 05-17-2011 02:47 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: germany Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi mira/bambus users,
we are running mira on hybrid libraries from 454 and illumina sequencers. To get nice scaffolds we are using bambus, which works quite well if we either use an illumina mate pair OR an 454 paired end data set. Now I tried the following .mate file for bambus: Code:
library illumina 100 1000 (HWUSI)* pair (.*)_.*\/1 (.*)_.*\/2 library 454large 3000 12000 ([0-9A-Z]{14})* pair ([0-9A-Z]{14})\.f ([0-9A-Z]{14})\.r Code:
<LIBRARY ID="lib_illumina" NAME="illumina" MIN="100" MAX="1000"> <INSERT ID="ins_2875100" NAME="HWUSI-EAS1580R:8:FC:6:61:6679:20212"> <SEQUENCE ID="seq_1976804" NAME="HWUSI-EAS1580R:8:FC:6:61:6679:20212_1:N:0:CGTACTAG/1"/> <SEQUENCE ID="seq_1976805" NAME="HWUSI-EAS1580R:8:FC:6:61:6679:20212_2:N:0:CGTACTAG/2"/> </INSERT> <INSERT ID="ins_2875137" NAME="HSOHGH202BO3NA"> <SEQUENCE ID="seq_1308766" NAME="HSOHGH202BO3NA.f"/> <SEQUENCE ID="seq_1306534" NAME="HSOHGH202BO3NA.r"/> </INSERT> all the best dragon0711 Last edited by dragon0711; 01-15-2013 at 07:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Utah, USA Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
|
![]()
I have the same question. Did you find a resolution to this problem? Thx
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
.mate file, bambus, libraries, scaffold |
Thread Tools | |
|
|